Makes sense.
Thanks
/Sudha
-Original Message-
From: Santhosh Edukulla
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 4:33 AM
To: Sudha Ponnaganti; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Tiered Quality
1. The below snapshot only depicts numbers only for KVM run.( A sample run ).
2. We will
chance to
provide better inputs.
Thanks!
Santhosh
From: Sudha Ponnaganti
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 7:26 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Santhosh Edukulla
Subject: RE: Tiered Quality
Thanks Santhosh for the coverage numbers. Does this include only
.
Thanks
/sudha
-Original Message-
From: Santhosh Edukulla [mailto:santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 2:52 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Tiered Quality
Coverage information for both unit and integration tests for a sample
regression run.
http
once we can add report plugin to it.
Regards,
Santhosh
From: Daan Hoogland [daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2013 7:07 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Tiered Quality
keep us posted before breakthrough as well, please. I'm very interested.
iday, November 01, 2013 10:48 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Tiered Quality
>
> I have heard about commercial tools that do more advanced coverage
> tracking. But if you think in open source, not sure Sonar really has an
> alternative. It is pretty cool anywa
> >>
>> >>
>> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/SONAR/Code+Coverage+by+Integration+Tests+for+Java+Project
>> >>
>> >> 3. Many links suggests it has good decision coverage facility compared
>> to other coverage tools.
>> >>
>&g
.
From: Laszlo Hornyak [laszlo.horn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 10:48 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tiered Quality
I have heard about commercial tools that do more advanced coverage
tracking. But if you think in open source, not
facility compared
> to other coverage tools.
> >>
> >>
> http://onlysoftware.wordpress.com/2012/12/19/code-coverage-tools-jacoco-cobertura-emma-comparison-in-sonar/
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Santhosh
> >>
other coverage tools.
>>
>> http://onlysoftware.wordpress.com/2012/12/19/code-coverage-tools-jacoco-cobertura-emma-comparison-in-sonar/
>>
>> Regards,
>> Santhosh
>> ____
>> From: Laszlo Hornyak [laszlo.horn...@gmail
> http://onlysoftware.wordpress.com/2012/12/19/code-coverage-tools-jacoco-cobertura-emma-comparison-in-sonar/
>
> Regards,
> Santhosh
>
> From: Laszlo Hornyak [laszlo.horn...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 1:43 PM
> To
From: Laszlo Hornyak [laszlo.horn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 1:43 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tiered Quality
Sonar already tracks the unit test coverage. It is also able to track the
integration test coverage, however this might be a
Sonar already tracks the unit test coverage. It is also able to track the
integration test coverage, however this might be a bit more sophisticated
in CS since not all hardware/software requirements are available in the
jenkins environment. However, this could be a problem in any environment.
On
We need a way to check coverage of (unit+integration) tests. How many
lines of code hit on a deployed system that corresponds to the
component donated/committed. We don't have that for existing tests so
it makes it hard to judge if a feature that comes with tests covers
enough of itself.
On Sun, O
Ok, makes sense, but that sounds like even more work :) Can you share the
plan on how will this work?
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Darren Shepherd <
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think it can't be at a component level because components are too large.
> It needs to be at a feature
I think it can't be at a component level because components are too large. It
needs to be at a feature for implementation level. For example, live storage
migration for xen and live storage migration for kvm (don't know if that's a
real thing) would be two separate items.
Darren
> On Oct 2
I believe this will be very useful for users.
As far as I understand someone will have to qualify components. What will
be the method for qualification? I do not think simply the test coverage
would be right. But then if you want to go deeper, then you need a bigger
effort testing the components.
16 matches
Mail list logo
