> -Original Message-
> From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 3:37 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Review request for storage motion on xenserver
>
> Hi Edison,
>
> Thanks a lot for looking at the changes. I am
com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 3:21 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Review request for storage motion on xenserver
>
> Sorry for the late. Following is my comments on storage motion:
> 1. We shouldn't touch volume state in virutalmachinemanager. I sp
Sorry for the late. Following is my comments on storage motion:
1. We shouldn't touch volume state in virutalmachinemanager. I spend a lot of
time trying to move volume related operations from virtualmachinemanager to
storage subsystem, better to follow the same pattern.
2. The current storage
