Subject: Re: Regarding Shrinking of Volume
This would also have to provide some info as to what constitutes a smaller disk
offering (then, I suppose, the GUI would use that info to compare the current
offering against the proposed offering).
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:51 AM, John Dilley
com]
> *Sent:* 14 August 2014 02:57
> *To:* dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> *Cc:* John Dilley
>
> *Subject:* Re: Regarding Shrinking of Volume
>
>
>
> As an example, I will note that the GUI submits requests to the management
> server that it could - in theory - validate loc
Dilley
Subject: Re: Regarding Shrinking of Volume
As an example, I will note that the GUI submits requests to the management
server that it could - in theory - validate locally.
However, the GUI is (rightly) intended in CloudStack to be a thin layer on top
of the API. It purposefully avoids
gt;FS at
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Resize+Data+Volumes
>> > claims that XenServer can shrink data volumes. Can I edit it and remove
>> >that claim from FS? Kindly let me know,
>> >
>> >Thank you,
>> >Ch
> >
> >-Original Message-----
> >From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> >Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 1:12 PM
> >To: John Dilley
> >Cc:
> >Subject: Re: Regarding Shrinking of Volume
> >
> >If you're asking what I think, it wo
Data+Volumes
> claims that XenServer can shrink data volumes. Can I edit it and remove
>that claim from FS? Kindly let me know,
>
>Thank you,
>Chandan.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 1:12 PM
>To
sage-
From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 1:12 PM
To: John Dilley
Cc:
Subject: Re: Regarding Shrinking of Volume
If you're asking what I think, it would be RAW. The pool type would be CLVM,
though. This is probably a better solution, as we likely wan
If you're asking what I think, it would be RAW. The pool type would be
CLVM, though. This is probably a better solution, as we likely want to
grow the cases that the automated tests run. If we're testing KVM at all it
is trivial to set up an LVM volume group as a storage pool to test against.
O
Hi,
I'll put a condition around the block that does the shrinking only in the case
of CLVM. Would the disk image type be "CLVM" instead of "qcow2"?
Thanks,
John
> On 13 Aug 2014, at 20:39, "Mike Tutkowski"
> wrote:
>
> This is how Marcus responded:
>
> Yes, this is true. Ideally other stor
This is how Marcus responded:
Yes, this is true. Ideally other storage maintainers/drivers would
implement it as well, but we only committed a test for shrinking clvm (over
a year ago now). I'd like to keep the test itself to run regression against
clvm, but since this test is being used now for s
Marcus,
May I know your response,
Thank you,
Chandan.
-Original Message-
From: Chandan Purushothama [mailto:chandan.purushoth...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:37 PM
To: Marcus
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Regarding Shrinking of Volume
Hello Marcus,
I see that
Yes, this is true. Ideally other storage maintainers/drivers would
implement it as well, but we only committed a test for shrinking clvm (over
a year ago now). I'd like to keep the test itself to run regression against
clvm, but since this test is being used now for some continuous integration
or o
12 matches
Mail list logo
