Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

Midokura told us that it was a bad idea, probably wouldn't work and > we > > should just switch to openstack. > > > > > > - Si > > > > ____ > > From: Erik Weber > > Sent: T

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

__ > From: Erik Weber > Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 3:28 AM > To: dev > Subject: Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Rafael Weingärtner > wrote: > > I got a reply

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

: Erik Weber > Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 3:28 AM > To: dev > Subject: Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Rafael Weingärtner > wrote: > > I got a reply from Midonet community; they said

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

just switch to openstack. - Si From: Erik Weber Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 3:28 AM To: dev Subject: Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Rafael Weingärtner wrote

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

lab back in early 2016 and Midokura > told us that it was a bad idea, probably wouldn't work and we should just > switch to openstack. > > > - Si > > > From: Erik Weber > Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 3:28 AM > To: dev > Su

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

We took a look at testing it in the lab back in early 2016 and Midokura told us that it was a bad idea, probably wouldn't work and we should just switch to openstack. - Si From: Erik Weber Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 3:28 AM To: dev Subject: Re: mi

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: > I got a reply from Midonet community; they said that midonet-client was > incorporated by midonet-cluster ( > https://github.com/midonet/midonet/tree/staging/v5.4/midonet-cluster). > > > So, if anyone wants to invest energy on this, it m

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

at 11:08 AM, Daan Hoogland < > > > > > daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I was about to reply along those lines. As you brought it up, > we > > > are > > > > > >

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Jeff Hair [mailto:j...@greenqloud.com] > Sent: 10 March 2017 13:45 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re:

RE: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

paul.an...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Jeff Hair [mailto:j...@greenqloud.com] Sent: 10 March 2017 13:45 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

e is some overriding of the sorted classpath > > > >> loader. > > > >> > > > > >> > *Jeff Hair* > > > >> > Technical Lead and Software Developer > > > >> > > > > >> > Tel: (+354) 415 0200 > > > >> >

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

chnical Lead and Software Developer > > >> > > > >> > Tel: (+354) 415 0200 > > >> > j...@greenqloud.com > > >> > www.greenqloud.com > > >> > > > >> > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Rohit Yadav < > >

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

gt; > >> > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Rohit Yadav < > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > >> > > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > +1 Retire unsupported plugins, with at least comment them from the > >> > default > >> > >

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

Retire unsupported plugins, with at least comment them from the >> > default >> > > build/packaging in plugins/pom.xml? >> > > >> > > >> > > Several plugins in 'plugins/network-elements/' may be removed from the >> > > default buil

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

donet' was never fully implemented > > or > > > completed and most definitely removed. > > > > > > > > > Regards. > > > > > > > > > From: Simon Weller > > > Sent: 09 March 2017

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

ral plugins in 'plugins/network-elements/' may be removed from the > > default build/packaging. However, 'midonet' was never fully implemented > or > > completed and most definitely removed. > > > > > > Regards. > > > > ____

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

rom: Simon Weller > Sent: 09 March 2017 21:37:08 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict > > So this brings up a good discussion point. As Jeff points out, the Midonet > plugin hasn't been actively supported for almos

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

and most definitely removed. Regards. From: Simon Weller Sent: 09 March 2017 21:37:08 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict So this brings up a good discussion point. As Jeff points out, the Midonet plugin hasn'

Re: MidoNet

. Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: 10 March 2017 12:41:42 To: dev Subject: Re: MidoNet Marty, midonet has been in there for a long time but is not maintained very well and as far as we know is not intensively tested in production environments. So if you are willing to

Re: MidoNet

, March 9, 2017 5:50 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: MidoNet > > Haha, your timing is amazing. There is another thread going on about MidoNet > right now. Are you using it already? > > *Will STEVENS* > Lead Developer > > <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> >

RE: MidoNet

Subject: Re: MidoNet Haha, your timing is amazing. There is another thread going on about MidoNet right now. Are you using it already? *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Marty Godsey wrote: > Has MidoNet support for XenServer been add

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

> > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Daan Hoogland < > > > > > > daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I was

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

e > > > > > > > people > > > > > > > > using it, right? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Daan Hoogland < > > > > > > daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > > > >

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

was about to reply along those lines. As you brought it up, > we > > > are > > > > > > >> now considering it. If the fix is easy I'd say let it stay > till > > > the > > > > > > >> next problem but it is ot the first time

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

t; > > >> I was about to reply along those lines. As you brought it up, we > > are > > > > > >> now considering it. If the fix is easy I'd say let it stay till > > the > > > > > >> next problem but it is ot the

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

easy I'd say let it stay till > the > > > > >> next problem but it is ot the first time mido bugs us. > > > > >> > > > > >> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Simon Weller > > wrote: > > > > >> > So this brings

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

bugs us. > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Simon Weller > wrote: > > > >> > So this brings up a good discussion point. As Jeff points out, the > > > >> Midonet plugin hasn't been actively supported for al

Re: MidoNet

Haha, your timing is amazing. There is another thread going on about MidoNet right now. Are you using it already? *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Marty Godsey wrote: > Has MidoNet support for XenServer been added to ACS 4.9.2? > > Regards

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

up a good discussion point. As Jeff points out, the > > >> Midonet plugin hasn't been actively supported for almost 5 years. At > > what > > >> point do we consider retiring unsupported plugins? > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > - Si > > >> > > > >> >

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

;t been actively supported for almost 5 years. At > what > >> point do we consider retiring unsupported plugins? > >> > > >> > > >> > - Si > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > From: Jeff Hair > >> > Sent: Th

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

r almost 5 years. At what >> point do we consider retiring unsupported plugins? >> > >> > >> > - Si >> > >> > >> > ________ >> > From: Jeff Hair >> > Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2017 9:43 AM >> >

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

t do we consider retiring unsupported plugins? > > > > > > - Si > > > > > > > > From: Jeff Hair > > Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2017 9:43 AM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: midonet-client an

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

M > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict > > After doing some more digging, I have confirmed the following: > >- The midonet plugin is using the Maven Shade plugin to put a bunch of >dependencies into itself. >

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict After doing some more digging, I have confirmed the following: - The midonet plugin is using the Maven Shade plugin to put a bunch of dependencies into itself. - The plugin hosted in this repository was

Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict

After doing some more digging, I have confirmed the following: - The midonet plugin is using the Maven Shade plugin to put a bunch of dependencies into itself. - The plugin hosted in this repository was last updated in 2013. - Most importantly: removing all the guava stuff out of the m

Re: midonet test failures

] > Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 10:41 AM > To: dev > Subject: Re: midonet test failures > > :) > > so you did do a clean etc, didn't you? > > thanks for allerting us > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Roger Crerie wrote: >> Now that my OWM3 test failures

RE: midonet test failures

Sorry for the false alarm . The mvn clean seems to have done the trick. Roger -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 10:41 AM To: dev Subject: Re: midonet test failures :) so you did do a clean etc, didn't you? t

Re: midonet test failures

:) so you did do a clean etc, didn't you? thanks for allerting us On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Roger Crerie wrote: > Now that my OWM3 test failures are fixed I figured I would also alert the > world to failures I am seeing on the midonet tests. Again I am building in > Cygwin on a window