Re: KVM development, libvirt

2013-06-07 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 11:26:22AM -0400, John Burwell wrote: > Prasanna, > > What if we made passing the Jenkins tests a pre-requisite to open > voting? In such a scenario, the test report from the Jenkins build > would be attached to the voting email. > Absolutely, We already do check that a

Re: KVM development, libvirt

2013-06-07 Thread John Burwell
Prasanna, What if we made passing the Jenkins tests a pre-requisite to open voting? In such a scenario, the test report from the Jenkins build would be attached to the voting email. Thanks, -John On Jun 7, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 10:48:14PM -060

Re: KVM development, libvirt

2013-06-07 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 10:48:14PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Ok. Do we need to call a vote or something to change our rules to > solidify that we should require at least two votes from each supported > platform, whether they be automated tests or contributor tests? > I'd encourage that. Tha

Re: KVM development, libvirt

2013-06-06 Thread Marcus Sorensen
Ok. Do we need to call a vote or something to change our rules to solidify that we should require at least two votes from each supported platform, whether they be automated tests or contributor tests? On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:20 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:04:55AM +

Re: KVM development, libvirt

2013-06-06 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:04:55AM +0200, Ove Ewerlid wrote: > On 06/06/2013 08:37 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > >On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:29:26AM +0200, Ove Ewerlid wrote: > >>On 06/06/2013 07:10 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > >>>On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 05:39:16PM +, Edison Su wrote: > >>

Re: KVM development, libvirt

2013-06-06 Thread Ove Ewerlid
On 06/06/2013 08:37 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:29:26AM +0200, Ove Ewerlid wrote: On 06/06/2013 07:10 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 05:39:16PM +, Edison Su wrote: I think we miss a VOTE from Jenkins, the vote from Jenkins should be take

Re: KVM development, libvirt

2013-06-05 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:29:26AM +0200, Ove Ewerlid wrote: > On 06/06/2013 07:10 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > >On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 05:39:16PM +, Edison Su wrote: > >>I think we miss a VOTE from Jenkins, the vote from Jenkins should > >>be taken as highest priority in each release. Thi

Re: KVM development, libvirt

2013-06-05 Thread Ove Ewerlid
On 06/06/2013 07:10 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 05:39:16PM +, Edison Su wrote: I think we miss a VOTE from Jenkins, the vote from Jenkins should be taken as highest priority in each release. This kind of regression should be easily identified in Jenkins(If we have

Re: KVM development, libvirt

2013-06-05 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 05:39:16PM +, Edison Su wrote: > I think we miss a VOTE from Jenkins, the vote from Jenkins should > be taken as highest priority in each release. This kind of > regression should be easily identified in Jenkins(If we have a > regression test for each environment). >

RE: KVM development, libvirt

2013-06-05 Thread Edison Su
I think we miss a VOTE from Jenkins, the vote from Jenkins should be taken as highest priority in each release. This kind of regression should be easily identified in Jenkins(If we have a regression test for each environment). > -Original Message- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow.

Re: KVM development, libvirt

2013-06-05 Thread Wei ZHOU
I mean upgrade libvirt. -Wei

Re: KVM development, libvirt

2013-06-05 Thread Wei ZHOU
I am sorry I have met this issue but ignored it as it worked after upgrade. I agree with that we should test on each OS. For the new feature, we should check the minimal software version at first. For the issue,is it ok to tell users the upgrade process in the installation guide on website? -Wei