RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

April 2014 10:33 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... Excellent news! Quick question. I tried using centos 6.5 with 4.2.1, however after installing I could never log in with the default username\password combo of admin\password. Did you experience that

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

Excellent news! Quick question. I tried using centos 6.5 with 4.2.1, however after installing I could never log in with the default username\password combo of admin\password. Did you experience that? > Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... > From: a...@opencloud.net.au >

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

ject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... Amin, Any luck on your project taking your 3 mgmt servers to 4.3 on Centos 6.5? > Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... > From: a...@opencloud.net.au > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 11:10:28 +0800 > > Thanks and

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

Xen Server 6.1 with the latest updates As of today 11-April-2014 Kind Regards Amin -Original Message- From: Michael Phillips [mailto:mphilli7...@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, 11 April 2014 9:16 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... Gotcha... What

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

Gotcha... What hypervisor are you using with CS? > Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... > From: a...@opencloud.net.au > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 09:05:29 +0800 > > Michael, > Just give me two days, will feedback you. I have to leave it til

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... Amin, Any luck on your project taking your 3 mgmt servers to 4.3 on Centos 6.5? > Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... > From: a...@opencloud.net.au > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 11:10:28 +0800 > > Tha

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

Amin, Any luck on your project taking your 3 mgmt servers to 4.3 on Centos 6.5? > Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... > From: a...@opencloud.net.au > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 11:10:28 +0800 > > Thanks and thanks for sharing the steps >

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... Took about 2 days, but the heap space issue has re-occurred. ...sigh... So switching to tomcat 6.0.33 had zero effect.. Anyone else have any ideas?? > Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... > From: a...@opencloud.net.au > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org &g

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

Took about 2 days, but the heap space issue has re-occurred. ...sigh... So switching to tomcat 6.0.33 had zero effect.. Anyone else have any ideas?? > Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... > From: a...@opencloud.net.au > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 11

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

So far so good :) > Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... > From: a...@opencloud.net.au > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 11:10:28 +0800 > > Thanks and thanks for sharing the steps > > Kind Regards > Amin > > -Original Mess

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

No problem. CS is at least running on tomcat 6.0.33 so that's good news. :) > Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... > From: a...@opencloud.net.au > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 11:10:28 +0800 > > Thanks and thanks for sharing the steps &

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

Thanks and thanks for sharing the steps Kind Regards Amin -Original Message- From: Michael Phillips [mailto:mphilli7...@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, 4 April 2014 11:02 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... So I manually downloaded tomcat 6.0.33

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

://stackoverflow.com/questions/14925073/how-to-find-out-running-tomcat-version I'll definitely let you know how it goes... > Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... > From: a...@opencloud.net.au > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 10:43:35 +0800 > > I trie

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

-Original Message- From: Michael Phillips [mailto:mphilli7...@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, 4 April 2014 10:41 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... So did you try changing your version of tomcat? > Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... > F

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

So did you try changing your version of tomcat? > Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... > From: a...@opencloud.net.au > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 10:35:42 +0800 > > cd /usr/share/tomcat6/bin/ > ./version.sh > > The output should

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

Phillips [mailto:mphilli7...@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, 4 April 2014 10:31 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... I've put tomcat 6.0.33 on our mgmt servers. I'm going to monitor it for the next few days to see if we get the error again. Do you know any

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

I've put tomcat 6.0.33 on our mgmt servers. I'm going to monitor it for the next few days to see if we get the error again. Do you know any way way to verify the version of tomcat that's running? > Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... > From: a...@openc

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... A few other articles also mention setting the initial heap size "-Xms" to the same value as the heap size, to go ahead and fully commit the heap. Have you tried that? One other thing I am curious of is have you fiddle

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

egards > Amin > > > > -Original Message- > From: Michael Phillips [mailto:mphilli7...@hotmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, 3 April 2014 9:24 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... > > This may be a silly question, but in al

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... This may be a silly question, but in all of the docs I am reading online in regards to increasing the java heap size, they are specifying it as -Xmx"size""MB" example -Xmx2048m vs -Xmx2g Is it possible that it's not reading the 2g va

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

This may be a silly question, but in all of the docs I am reading online in regards to increasing the java heap size, they are specifying it as -Xmx"size""MB" example -Xmx2048m vs -Xmx2g Is it possible that it's not reading the 2g variable as 2GB? > Subject:

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

ent and it worked. If someone else has a better solution than this would you please share it? Kind Regards Amin -Original Message- From: Michael Phillips [mailto:mphilli7...@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 3 April 2014 5:31 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issu

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

icate=false -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false -Xmx4g -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError -XX:HeapDumpPath=/var/log/cloudstack/management/ -XX:PermSize=512M -XX:MaxPermSize=800m" So what version of tomcat are you running 6.0.35 or 6.0.33? > Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

Amin -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 1 April 2014 6:22 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... I'm running 3 mgmt servers on 4.2.1, haven't seen any issues like that. You can send along your

Re: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

I'm running 3 mgmt servers on 4.2.1, haven't seen any issues like that. You can send along your memory settings... here's what I'm running: JAVA_OPTS="-Djava.awt.headless=true -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=45219 -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote