On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Donal Lafferty
wrote:
> Could I get some more clarity on how to deal with Microsoft dependencies?
>
> ".NET Framwork V4.5" is straightforward. It's like a JDK and a JRE, because
> after installation you can build and run against it. It comes with a
> separate in
" mean?
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: 03 July 2013 3:40 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Hyper-V plugin - IP Dependencies
>
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 02:26:50PM -0700, Kevin Kluge wrote:
&g
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 02:26:50PM -0700, Kevin Kluge wrote:
> Donal, I could not find a response to this.
>
> The dependencies that are Apache or MIT licensed are fine.
+1
>
> I think the .NET run time dep is fine as well. I expect it will be
> pre-installed, just like ESXi is today. We j
Donal, I could not find a response to this.
The dependencies that are Apache or MIT licensed are fine.
I think the .NET run time dep is fine as well. I expect it will be
pre-installed, just like ESXi is today. We just have to document that in the
install guide.
I know there was some discus