Re: Hyper-V plugin - IP Dependencies

2013-07-03 Thread David Nalley
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > Could I get some more clarity on how to deal with Microsoft dependencies? > > ".NET Framwork V4.5" is straightforward. It's like a JDK and a JRE, because > after installation you can build and run against it. It comes with a > separate in

RE: Hyper-V plugin - IP Dependencies

2013-07-03 Thread Donal Lafferty
" mean? > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: 03 July 2013 3:40 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Hyper-V plugin - IP Dependencies > > On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 02:26:50PM -0700, Kevin Kluge wrote: &g

Re: Hyper-V plugin - IP Dependencies

2013-07-03 Thread Chip Childers
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 02:26:50PM -0700, Kevin Kluge wrote: > Donal, I could not find a response to this. > > The dependencies that are Apache or MIT licensed are fine. +1 > > I think the .NET run time dep is fine as well. I expect it will be > pre-installed, just like ESXi is today. We j

RE: Hyper-V plugin - IP Dependencies

2013-07-02 Thread Kevin Kluge
Donal, I could not find a response to this. The dependencies that are Apache or MIT licensed are fine. I think the .NET run time dep is fine as well. I expect it will be pre-installed, just like ESXi is today. We just have to document that in the install guide. I know there was some discus