Re: Cluster/Host dedication logic

2014-09-30 Thread Daan Hoogland
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Logan Barfield wrote: ​...​ > From a service provider perspective we have two types of customers: > - Public Cloud: Using cloud instances deployed on shared > hardware/storage/etc. > - Private Cloud: Customers that pay for dedicated resources (e.g. > hypervisors,

Re: Cluster/Host dedication logic

2014-09-30 Thread Logan Barfield
Daan/Saksham, I would like to hash out exactly what problem needs to be solved before opening a Jira ticket about it. Daan, to answer your question I haven't implemented anything yet. I'm not a programmer, so at best I can come up with half-baked patches. To answer your other question regarding

RE: Cluster/Host dedication logic

2014-09-30 Thread Saksham Srivastava
Logan you are correct. We currently have a limitation on placing system vms and VRs on dedicated resources. They do not strictly adhere to dedication. It would be good if you could please file Jira tickets regarding the proposed enhancements so that we can track it. Thanks, Saksham -Origina

Re: Cluster/Host dedication logic

2014-09-30 Thread Daan Hoogland
Logan, makes sense to me. Actually, the behaviour you describe should be the default IMO. On the other hand, What would a client do in a cloud if not to share resources. If not they should own their own zone. and put everything (including proxy+ssvm) in that zone. Did you implement anything yet?