Thanks!
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Michael Phillips
wrote:
> I created the feature request, hopefully it will gets some traction and get
> implemented.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6454?filter=-2
>
>> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 15:35:45 -0600
>>
I created the feature request, hopefully it will gets some traction and get
implemented.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6454?filter=-2
> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 15:35:45 -0600
> Subject: Re: CS cores vs sockets
> From: shadow...@gmail.com
> To: dev@cloudstac
Sorry, that was a *thumbsup*, but I forgot that the list doesn't like HTML
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Nux! wrote:
> On 17.04.2014 22:19, Marcus wrote:
>
>> [?]
>>
>
> Thanks for implementing this for KVM that is. :)
>
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
>
On 17.04.2014 22:19, Marcus wrote:
[?]
Thanks for implementing this for KVM that is. :)
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
[?]
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Nux! wrote:
> On 17.04.2014 19:37, Marcus wrote:
>
>> Probably not, since I implemented the KVM change out of necessity. I
>> mentioned it on-list, but there's not a lot of formal synchronization
>> between the hypervisors for small tweaks like that. If it g
On 17.04.2014 19:37, Marcus wrote:
Probably not, since I implemented the KVM change out of necessity. I
mentioned it on-list, but there's not a lot of formal synchronization
between the hypervisors for small tweaks like that. If it goes into
the service offering that would prompt everyone to look
>
> Original message From: Marcus
> Date:04/17/2014 1:07 PM (GMT-06:00)
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CS cores vs
> sockets
>
> With KVM this has been mitigated somewhat in newer code (4.3 and up).
> It's a bit rudimentary, but we c
Would seem to be an easy to do...
Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S®4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
Original message From: Marcus
Date:04/17/2014 1:09 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CS cores vs
sockets
Or like you mention, service offerings c
I'm still on 4.2.1, I wonder if the same changes were made with vmware on 4.3
up...
Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S®4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
Original message From: Marcus
Date:04/17/2014 1:07 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CS cores vs
Or like you mention, service offerings could have a 'cores per socket' setting.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Marcus wrote:
> With KVM this has been mitigated somewhat in newer code (4.3 and up).
> It's a bit rudimentary, but we could expand it to work via config
> options. Right now, if the
With KVM this has been mitigated somewhat in newer code (4.3 and up).
It's a bit rudimentary, but we could expand it to work via config
options. Right now, if the number of cores is divisible by 4, it
creates quad core sockets. If the number is divisible by 6, it creates
hexacore sockets, with the
11 matches
Mail list logo
