On Aug 22, 2014, at 6:04 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
> On Aug 19, 2014, at 11:06 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>> On Aug 19, 2014, at 4:38 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Sebastien,
>>>
>>> On 19-Aug-2014, at 10:17 pm, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
The fact that we basically have none, pushes m
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
> On Aug 19, 2014, at 11:06 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>> On Aug 19, 2014, at 4:38 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Sebastien,
>>>
>>> On 19-Aug-2014, at 10:17 pm, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
The fact that we basically have none, pushes m
On Aug 19, 2014, at 11:06 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> On Aug 19, 2014, at 4:38 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
>> Hi Sebastien,
>>
>> On 19-Aug-2014, at 10:17 pm, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>>> The fact that we basically have none, pushes me to argue for a change in
>>> git workflow (see several
past couple of years
with slow progress in this area i.e adding automated or unit tests with check
ins.
Thanks
/sudha
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 2:05 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: 4.5 RM
I see
are effective and properly
maintained.
-Koushik
-Original Message-
From: ilya musayev [mailto:ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 20 August 2014 5:22 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.5 RM
David
Since CI has been mentioned several times, do you know where we
David
Since CI has been mentioned several times, do you know where we stand
with donated hardware?
Thanks
ilya
On 8/19/14, 10:15 AM, David Nalley wrote:
IMHO we should not even release 4.5 until we have a agreed upon:
-what our issues are and why we released 4.4 and 4.3 late.
-taken action t
On Aug 19, 2014, at 4:38 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi Sebastien,
>
> On 19-Aug-2014, at 10:17 pm, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>> The fact that we basically have none, pushes me to argue for a change in git
>> workflow (see several other threads). because it will be way faster to start
>> "gatin
> I personally think that everyone has used Github and it would take
everyone less time to start using it
Plus one to using github. I found using review board for uploading .patch
files to be a horrible experience.
The fork and pull request nature of github in my view compliments git and a
neat w
Hi Sebastien,
On 19-Aug-2014, at 10:17 pm, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> The fact that we basically have none, pushes me to argue for a change in git
> workflow (see several other threads). because it will be way faster to start
> "gating" commits using a new agreed upon workflow (even though it
st 19, 2014 10:16 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 4.5 RM
>
>>
>> IMHO we should not even release 4.5 until we have a agreed upon:
>>
>> -what our issues are and why we released 4.4 and 4.3 late.
>> -taken action to resolve those issues
>> -guaran
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:15 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> >
> > IMHO we should not even release 4.5 until we have a agreed upon:
> >
> > -what our issues are and why we released 4.4 and 4.3 late.
> > -taken action to resolve those issues
> > -guarantees that 4.5 will be on time
> >
> > If we don't d
+1 Agree that we need to have some form of CI to control basic quality
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 10:16 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.5 RM
>
> IMHO we should not even release 4.5 until we have a
Hey David!
Before you or anyone reads this, I want to say that I support what you’re
trying to do here.
I’ve few ideas and concerns so if anyone is skimming please go to the bottom
and read the list.
On 19-Aug-2014, at 7:15 pm, David Nalley wrote:
>>
>> IMHO we should not even release 4.5 un
ssion about code review and CI?
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 10:16 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 4.5 RM
>
> >
> > IMHO we should not even release 4.5 until we have a ag
+1 on what David said. Shared the same feelings as him, we really need to
focus on the high priority issue facing CloudStack. Gerrit/Github pull
request will definitely help in this regards.
Thanks
-min
On 8/19/14 10:15 AM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>>
>> IMHO we should not even release 4.5 until
>
> IMHO we should not even release 4.5 until we have a agreed upon:
>
> -what our issues are and why we released 4.4 and 4.3 late.
> -taken action to resolve those issues
> -guarantees that 4.5 will be on time
>
> If we don't do that, I don't even know why we are putting ourselves through
> the p
Thanks for being willing to take on this role, David!
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:24 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> Hi folks;
>
> So we haven't had anyone step up to be release manager for 4.5 yet. So
> you consider this either a threat or me volunteering depending on your
> perspective. :)
>
> If no
On Aug 11, 2014, at 1:34 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi Sebastien,
>
> On 11-Aug-2014, at 5:35 pm, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
>>
>> On Aug 11, 2014, at 9:24 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>>
>>> Hi folks;
>>>
>>> So we haven't had anyone step up to be release manager for 4.5 yet. So
>>> you consid
Hi Sebastien,
On 11-Aug-2014, at 5:35 pm, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Aug 11, 2014, at 9:24 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> Hi folks;
>>
>> So we haven't had anyone step up to be release manager for 4.5 yet. So
>> you consider this either a threat or me volunteering depending on your
>> persp
Hey David,
On 11-Aug-2014, at 3:24 pm, David Nalley wrote:
> Hi folks;
>
> So we haven't had anyone step up to be release manager for 4.5 yet. So
> you consider this either a threat or me volunteering depending on your
> perspective. :)
Awesome, go for it!
> If no one else steps up by midweek
On Aug 11, 2014, at 9:24 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> Hi folks;
>
> So we haven't had anyone step up to be release manager for 4.5 yet. So
> you consider this either a threat or me volunteering depending on your
> perspective. :)
>
> If no one else steps up by midweek I'm happy to be the RM for 4
21 matches
Mail list logo
