Just pushed a fix for that to master.
On Feb 25, 2014, at 5:55 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com>> wrote:
So how do you now Œprovide¹ the jdbc connector on a Mac?
mvn -Pdeveloper -pl developer -Ddeploydb-simulator
Š
SQL exception in trying initDB: java.sql.SQLException: No
So how do you now Œprovide¹ the jdbc connector on a Mac?
mvn -Pdeveloper -pl developer -Ddeploydb-simulator
Š
SQL exception in trying initDB: java.sql.SQLException: No suitable driver
found for jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/
On 2/21/14, 5:56 AM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote:
>
>Heya,
>
>Just pushed c
I've been a little behind on e-mail and just reading up on this legal issue
in more detail now.
I agree we should be -1 on 4.3 until we have a good resolution for it.
Thanks
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Animesh,
>
> Having followed the legal discussions and remarks f
on
> ESXi.
> > ---
> >
> > The kind of installed guest operating system
> > Debian_64
> > Debian_64
> > ---
> > Also it still has Vbox specific sections which may not make sense to
> vCenter. Ofcourse this would not blo
Packages already depend on the mysql connector, so no changes there.
We do need to configure tomcat to include the os provided mysql-connector into
the class path of the application.
Cheers,
Hugo
On 21 feb. 2014, at 14:57, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> Forgot to mention that this is pushed to ma
Forgot to mention that this is pushed to master so we can test it before we
drag it to 4.3
Cheers,
Hugo
On 21 feb. 2014, at 14:56, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
>
> Heya,
>
> Just pushed commit ac00ab0087ca8f59184121697f7ac4343a694093
> Author: Hugo Trippaers
> Date: Fri Feb 21 14:54:38 2014
Heya,
Just pushed commit ac00ab0087ca8f59184121697f7ac4343a694093
Author: Hugo Trippaers
Date: Fri Feb 21 14:54:38 2014 +0100
Cleanup all mysql dependencies and set all to provided.
This will set all mysql dependencies to provided and clean them up in the
process.
Tested:
Hugos-MacBoo
What I get is that by fixing the pom.xml, maven will not package the
connector.
The dependency for the connector was set to compile time that made the
maven to download the connector at compile time instead of at run-time.
Due to this the connector got packaged.
Now changing it to provided will ma
sure,
we will need to do something in install instructions as well, do we?
thanks,
Daan
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Abhinandan Prateek
wrote:
> Daan,
>
> It seems that the dependency on the connector can be changed so that the
> connector is not packaged with the product.
> Once Damodar,
Daan,
It seems that the dependency on the connector can be changed so that the
connector is not packaged with the product.
Once Damodar, who is fixing it provides a patch we can take a call.
-abhi
On 21/02/14 5:31 pm, "Daan Hoogland" wrote:
>Animesh,
>
>Having followed the legal discussion
Animesh,
Having followed the legal discussions and remarks from David on these
matters, I will have to retract my +1 and cast a -1 (binding). I
suggest we postpone 4.3 indefinitely awaiting legal advice and
discussion on how to proceed on this list.
sorry,
Daan
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:16 PM,
Hi,
I agree with Florin about GRE tunnel. It is very problematic. If i can't
get GRE tunnels working with xenserver 6.2, i won't be able to use the ACS
4.3
So the jira CLOUDSTACK-5967 is not resolved, isn't it ?
Murali, you said on the Feb 14th (CLOUDSTACK-5967) that if there is a new
RC :
"Fix
There is a bug filed for live migration on ESXi 5.5.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6146
I feel we need to fix this bug too in 4.3.
Thanks,
~Talluri
On 20/02/14 11:19 pm, "David Nalley" wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Chip Childers
>wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 a
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 04:25:21AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>>
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>
> Given the recently noticed legal issues with the mysql-connector-java
> depen
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 04:25:21AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
Given the recently noticed legal issues with the mysql-connector-java
dependency, I'm -1 (binding) until that is resolved.
-chip
+1 (binding)
Tested:
XenServer 6.2, Primary NFS, Secondary NFS, Two physical networks with Guest
traffic on both
Tested 64bit systemvm template (jenkins version)
Tested SSVM using the Xen VHD template
Tested instance creation on VLAN based networks
Tested instance creation on NS
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: 20 February 2014 12:11
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
+1 (binding)
based on the rc-5 testing I've done and a diff of the releases. The extra patch
I asked for is being tested by Hug
> -Original Message-
>>> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
>>> Sent: 20 February 2014 17:05
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
>>>
>>> On 20.02.2014 00:10, Animesh Chatur
On 20.02.2014 11:58, Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: 20 February 2014 17:05
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
On 20.02.2014 00:10, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Folks
I want to
> -Original Message-
> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
> Sent: 20 February 2014 17:05
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
>
> On 20.02.2014 00:10, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> > Folks
> >
> &
On 20.02.2014 00:10, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Folks
I want to clear up the confusion on system templates for 4.3
I have noticed the system vms come up with 128 MB ram, isn't this a bit
too little for 64bit machines?
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.n
d not block deployment of the template in itself. Removing
> this section ( ...) would make it cleaner.
>
> Regards,
> Sateesh
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
>> Sent: 20 February 2014 13:18
0 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: 20 February 2014 00:11
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
Folks
I want to clear up the conf
ate in
>itself. Removing this section ( ...) would
>make it cleaner.
>
>Regards,
>Sateesh
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
>> Sent: 20 February 2014 13:18
>> To:
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE
Hyper-V template is generated from the Jenkins job and same is tested and
specified here.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 1:18 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
>
> Animesh,
>
> Before we agree to use these templates, please detail how these are build.
> The current process is not transparent to the developer
> community so for now i'm -1 on using these templates. The p
Animesh,
Before we agree to use these templates, please detail how these are build. The
current process is not transparent to the developer community so for now i’m -1
on using these templates. The process should be clear end-to-end before we can
reasonably be expected to vote on a release as t
Folks I am now extending the voting period to regular 72 hours based on
clarification from Chip in private@ and will now close on Friday evening PST.
Please provide your feedback soon and help close out the release.
Thanks
Animesh
On Feb 18, 2014, at 8:25 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi"
mailto:animes
+1
Tested Adv. Zone with XS 6.2, Built Windows 2008 VM from ISO, Deleted
failed ISO, Snapshot, Create a template from snapshot.
However, I am still running into this bug:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6096 (which is not a
blocker, but still very very annoying).
Another t
Folks
I want to clear up the confusion on system templates for 4.3
We had fixed the templates to be used in 4.3 and reflected the links in
cloudstack database after uploading to download.cloud.com
Here are the links:
HyperV:
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2013
> -Original Message-
> From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 7:10 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
>
> So looks like we should all be t
/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5883
Regards,
Rayees
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 11:02 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Hugo Trippaers; Sateesh Chodapuneedi; Rayees Namathponnan
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
I se
Happy to report that the Remote User VPC VPN appears to be included in the
latest RC so will fully test tomorrow.
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Higginbottom
Sent:
> -Original Message-
> From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 6:47 AM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
>
>
> Just checked the new systemvms. The build date Geoff
ebruary 19, 2014 7:08 AM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
>
> Geoff,
>
> The latest build is always on the jenkins server,
> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-systemvm64/
>
> I think Edison does the uploads of the
Hi,
GRE is still problematic, I am not able to get it to work with this RC in a
setup that I have been using successfully with CS 4.1.1.
I have XenServer 6.1.0 hypervisors. I have pod1/cluster1/host1 hosting one VM
and pod2/cluster2/host2 hosting the second VM.
The VMs are up and running, so is
> -Original Message-
> From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 6:47 AM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
>
>
> Just checked the new systemvms. The build date Geoff
...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
Sent: 19 February 2014 15:08
To:
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
Geoff,
The latest build is always on the jenkins server,
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-systemvm64/
I think Edison does the uploads of the images
ginal Message-
> From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
> Sent: 19 February 2014 10:56
> To:
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
>
> -1 (binding)
>
> I'm trying to upgrade an existing cloudstack installation fr
: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
Sent: 19 February 2014 14:47
To:
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
Just checked the new systemvms. The build date Geoff put in the file is
2014-01-14, but the last changes to the systemvms have been made on jan
igginbot...@shapeblue.com
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
>> Sent: 19 February 2014 10:56
>> To:
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
>>
>> -1 (bindin
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
> Sent: 19 February 2014 10:56
> To:
> Subject: Re: [V
lf Of Hugo Trippaers
Sent: 19 February 2014 10:56
To:
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
-1 (binding)
I'm trying to upgrade an existing cloudstack installation from version 4.2.1 to
version 4.3 and this is flinging because the database checker can't find the
c
On 19.02.2014 10:55, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
-1 (binding)
I’m trying to upgrade an existing cloudstack installation from
version 4.2.1 to version 4.3 and this is flinging because the database
checker can’t find the correct systemvm templates for the 4.3 release.
I found the release notes at
http:/
-1 (binding)
I’m trying to upgrade an existing cloudstack installation from version 4.2.1 to
version 4.3 and this is flinging because the database checker can’t find the
correct systemvm templates for the 4.3 release. I found the release notes at
http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedo
sorry for not replying to your question in the rc-5 thread Animesh. I
can deal with a shorter window on this one as you asked. Didn't speak
with Hugo yet. For your assurance we are considering going to or
project env with the rc(6) no matter what the vote will be.
@Sheng: you are right about point
46 matches
Mail list logo
