day 10 December 2014 10:17 PM, Suresh Sadhu wrote:
+1
-Original Message-
From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:raj...@apache.org]
Sent: 10 December 2014 06:20
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Simplify CloudMonkey's branching/maintenance process
+1
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1
+1
-Original Message-
From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:raj...@apache.org]
Sent: 10 December 2014 06:20
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Simplify CloudMonkey's branching/maintenance process
+1
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 18:55 PM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
Hi,
CloudMonkey&
On tir. 9. des. 2014 at 14.27 Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi,
>
> CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linear and the work on master
> is simply getting synced on 5.3 branch. I want to ask the community if
> anyone has any objections on just keeping master as the working branch
> and have branches w
+1, keep it simple
> On 10-Dec-2014, at 4:21 am, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> +1 , I wish we could make such a call on the stack.
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 7:14 PM, sebgoa wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 9, 2014, at 2:25 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linea
+1
On Tuesday, December 9, 2014, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 18:55 PM, Rohit Yadav >
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linear and the work on master
> is simply getting synced on 5.3 branch. I want to ask the community if
> anyone has any
+1
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 18:55 PM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
Hi,
CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linear and the work on master
is simply getting synced on 5.3 branch. I want to ask the community if
anyone has any objections on just keeping master as the working branch
and have branches when
+1, it makes sense for cloudmonkey :)
On 9 December 2014 at 22:51, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> +1 , I wish we could make such a call on the stack.
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 7:14 PM, sebgoa wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 9, 2014, at 2:25 PM, Rohit Yadav
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> CloudMonkey's git repo
+1 , I wish we could make such a call on the stack.
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 7:14 PM, sebgoa wrote:
>
> On Dec 9, 2014, at 2:25 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linear and the work on master
>> is simply getting synced on 5.3 branch. I want to ask the
On Dec 9, 2014, at 2:25 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi,
>
> CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linear and the work on master
> is simply getting synced on 5.3 branch. I want to ask the community if
> anyone has any objections on just keeping master as the working branch
> and have branches w
+1 as long as CloudMonkey remains backwards compatible with older CloudStack
releases, so that we don't have to preserve old monkeys to talk to old stacks.
--
Stephen Turner
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 09 December 2014 13:26
To: dev
Su
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2014 02:25 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi,
>
> CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linear and the work on
> master is simply getting synced on 5.3 branch. I want to ask the
> community if anyone has any objections on just keeping master a
11 matches
Mail list logo
