Re: [PROPOSAL] git workflow

2014-06-01 Thread Rajani Karuturi
the code has changed? Don't the >> branches diverge and you end up cherry-picking after that? >> >> -- >> Stephen Turner >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] >> Sent: 30 May 2014

Re: [PROPOSAL] git workflow

2014-05-30 Thread Mike Tutkowski
n Turner > > > -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: 30 May 2014 18:48 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] git workflow > > I think this flow is something we should seriously consider. >

RE: [PROPOSAL] git workflow

2014-05-30 Thread Stephen Turner
ike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: 30 May 2014 18:48 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] git workflow I think this flow is something we should seriously consider. I find cherry picking from branch to branch to be error prone in that it's easy for someone to forget to cherry pick to

Re: [PROPOSAL] git workflow

2014-05-30 Thread Mike Tutkowski
I think this flow is something we should seriously consider. I find cherry picking from branch to branch to be error prone in that it's easy for someone to forget to cherry pick to all applicable branches and you don't have any easy way to see the cherry picks are related. When I worked at HP, we