RE: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes

2013-04-15 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 6:05 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath > Subject: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes > > Hi all, > > I've observed Radhika

Re: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes

2013-04-15 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013, at 02:31 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > I'm just wondering how we want to handle the case where review never > happens, or not in time for a scheduled release. I agree with Joe that > there's no point reverting an entire feature just because its docs were > not reviewed, but I'

Re: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes

2013-04-15 Thread Jessica Tomechak
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Rajesh Battala wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > > Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 7:47 PM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [DOCS] Document

RE: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes

2013-04-15 Thread Rajesh Battala
> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 7:47 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes > > On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 06:05:48PM

RE: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes

2013-04-15 Thread Radhika Puthiyetath
-Original Message- From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 4:36 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes On Sun, Apr 14, 2013, at 02:19 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: > Any penalties for peo

Re: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes

2013-04-15 Thread Chip Childers
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 06:05:48PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Sun, Apr 14, 2013, at 02:19 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: > > Any penalties for people who BLOCK documentation development ? > > Are there rewards for the folks who aren't blocking documentation > development? It's not like we c

Re: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes

2013-04-14 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013, at 02:19 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: > Any penalties for people who BLOCK documentation development ? Are there rewards for the folks who aren't blocking documentation development? It's not like we can dock their volunteer pay. ;-) In all seriousness - I'm sure that it's

RE: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes

2013-04-14 Thread Radhika Puthiyetath
Thanks Chip. I thought what is the point in submitting half-cooked stuff ? I waited for almost a month before reverting my earlier commit and deciding to go ahead with Review Board! My life as a writer is of course troublesome if the concerned has no time (max 30 min - 1 hour !!!) to look at

Re: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes

2013-04-11 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013, at 08:04 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > I've observed Radhika struggling to get reviews of her feature docs, and > having to work to provide patch after patch for reviewboard submissions. > > I have a proposal (which I think Joe hinted at in another thread): Indeed. > Doc wri