radeep.vit...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 10:48 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] api level access controll
Have you seen this. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ypkTAg
There was a recent thread on this ML as well.
On 1/31/14 8:35 AM, "Anton Opgenoor
:N relation with the
>resources, and/or API capabilities.
>
>Regards,
>
>Anton Opgenoort +31624864156
>
>-Original Message-----
>From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 12:55 PM
>To: dev
>Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] api level access cont
s a 1:N relationship with the roles, and each role has a
1:N relation with the resources, and/or API capabilities.
Regards,
Anton Opgenoort +31624864156
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 12:55 PM
To: dev
Subject:
Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 31 January 2014 11:13
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] api level access controll
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
>
>> H,
>>
>> I git a question of an oper
[mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
Sent: 31 January 2014 11:13
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] api level access controll
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> H,
>
> I git a question of an operator ad Schuberg Philis to crete a set of
> api keys and to
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> H,
>
> I git a question of an operator ad Schuberg Philis to crete a set of
> api keys and to have control over excatly what api calls are allowed
> for this set of keys. Does anybody else recognise this use case?
> already hacked it in? hav
