Abhi,
As Chip and I said, CLOUDSTACK-1755 is not a release blocker and would
be fixed in 4.2(as issue indicated).
--Sheng
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Abhinandan Prateek
wrote:
> There is some encouraging movement on 4.1 issues but still we have some of
> the blockers and criticals open:
>
I'm looking into CLOUDSTACK-1819. I'll be able to close it by Friday.
> -Original Message-
> From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 28 March 2013 10:28 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: cloudstack dev
> Su
There is some encouraging movement on 4.1 issues but still we have some of
the blockers and criticals open:
CLOUDSTACK-1819 Kishan Kavala
CLOUDSTACK-1805 Kelven Yang
CLOUDSTACK-1755 Sheng Yang
CLOUDSTACK-1664 Murali Reddy
-abhi
On 27/03/13 8:03 PM, "Abhinandan Prateek"
wrote:
>Text only li
1776 is likely redundant with 1811, since if 1811 is resolved and the
management server doesn't continue to run on upgrade failure, it won't
be running to cause an NPE in checking secondary storage. This is
fallout from the failed upgrade. Actually I think several of these are
related to the same 4
Text only list of blockers and criticals in 4.1 branch, please treat these
with expected urgency:
CLOUDSTACK-1819 Kishan Kavala
CLOUDSTACK-1811 Kelven Yang
CLOUDSTACK-1810 Min Chen
CLOUDSTACK-1805 Kelven Yang
CLOUDSTACK-1776 Kelven Yang
CLOUDSTACK-1755 Sheng Yang
CLOUDSTACK-1673 Murali Reddy
CLOUD
I'm sorry, but I can't read this email's content particularly well...
Can you please be sure to email in plain text?
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:28:26AM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
> Team,
> I think the 4.1 RC is not yet made as there are still several blockers and
> criticals, please trea
