Yes, git is a completely different workflow. Branch frequently...
commit frequently...
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> I see...maybe a local commit would have been preferable.
>
> I'm used to not committing until I have the code in a stable state
> (probably typical with
I see...maybe a local commit would have been preferable.
I'm used to not committing until I have the code in a stable state
(probably typical with centralized VCSs like SVN), but with my local repo I
suppose it doesn't matter as much.
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Mo
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 11:21:47AM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've used SVN for many years, but am a bit new to Git.
>
> I've been making changes locally in my repo for a while and wanted to
> update my repo from the "upstream" repo, but do not want to first stage or
> commit
