Re: For Advanced Zone

2021-09-13 Thread Vivek Kumar
Yes, you can create Advance Zone without having any actual public IP range. You can use your exiting LAN range and setup CloudStack. Then obviously you can only access from that network only. ( I hope this is for testing purpose or in-house deployment ) Vivek Kumar Sr. Manager - Cloud & DevOps

Re: For Advanced Zone

2021-09-09 Thread technologyrss.mail
I have kvm host server with two NIC, which method I use for create Advanced zone?  For physical NIC one and add all Management, Public & Guest values are cloudbr0,? or Physical NIC one for Management value cloudbr0  and another NIC Public & Guest values cloudbr1 this is correct or wrong ? P

Re: For Advanced Zone

2021-09-09 Thread technologyrss.mail
I have kvm host server with two NIC, which method I use for create Advanced zone?  For physical NIC one and add all Management, Public & Guest values are cloudbr0,? or Physical NIC one for Management value cloudbr0  and another NIC Public & Guest values cloudbr1 Please give me idea. --- A

Re: For Advanced Zone

2021-09-09 Thread Wei ZHOU
cloudstack requires at least 2 public IP, 1 for SSVM, 1 for CPVM. you can use internal IP as public IP of course. SSVM and CPVM will not be accessible from the Internet. -Wei On Thu, 9 Sept 2021 at 14:44, technologyrss.mail < technologyrss.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have one query like

For Advanced Zone

2021-09-09 Thread technologyrss.mail
Hi, I have one query like can I create Advanced Zone without public ip range only LAN? --- Alamin

Can I use only LAN for Advanced Zone

2021-09-02 Thread technologyrss.mail
*Hi,* Can I use only LAN for Advanced Zone? is it possible ? If possible so how can I setup network from.     Management, Public & Guest interface. All interface connected is LAN then set value is cloudbr0, is it correct? *or,* How can I create Advanced Zone without public ip for tes

Re: Review Request: integration test for advanced zone with security groups

2013-05-22 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
> On May 23, 2013, 5:16 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > +1 > > > > This looks super complete! Thanks for changing everything necessary! > > > > Since you are already a committer, would you like to commit this yourself? I'll setup the advanced security group zone across KVM on jenkins.buil

Re: Review Request: integration test for advanced zone with security groups

2013-05-22 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11332/#review20926 --- Ship it! +1 This looks super complete! Thanks for changing everyth

Review Request: integration test for advanced zone with security groups

2013-05-22 Thread Wei Zhou
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11332/ --- Review request for cloudstack and anthony xu. Description --- This patch i