On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Logan Barfield
wrote:
...
> From a service provider perspective we have two types of customers:
> - Public Cloud: Using cloud instances deployed on shared
> hardware/storage/etc.
> - Private Cloud: Customers that pay for dedicated resources (e.g.
> hypervisors,
could please file Jira tickets regarding the
> proposed enhancements so that we can track it.
>
> Thanks,
> Saksham
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Logan Barfield [mailto:lbarfi...@tqhosting.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 11:35 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache
-Original Message-
From: Logan Barfield [mailto:lbarfi...@tqhosting.com]
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 11:35 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Cluster/Host dedication logic
I was doing some testing with the explicit and implicit dedication features,
and was just wondering about the logic
Logan, makes sense to me. Actually, the behaviour you describe should be
the default IMO.
On the other hand, What would a client do in a cloud if not to share
resources. If not they should own their own zone. and put everything
(including proxy+ssvm) in that zone. Did you implement anything yet?
I was doing some testing with the explicit and implicit dedication
features, and was just wondering about the logic behind it.
>From a service provider perspective this feature seems most useful for
dedicating certain resources to a domain or account. In other words, a
client pays for a single ho
