template.
What is happening here? :)
Francois
--Sanjay
-Original Message-
From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 9:15 PM
To: Sanjay Tripathi
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sangeetha Hariharan; Animesh Chaturvedi
Subject: Re: CLOUDSTACK-5406
S
Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 9:15 PM
To: Sanjay Tripathi
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sangeetha Hariharan; Animesh Chaturvedi
Subject: Re: CLOUDSTACK-5406
Sanjay,
Yep, I understand that the bug was for resource count for secondary storage,
but the causes
27;: u'Unlimited',
u'snapshottotal': 0,
u'state': u'enabled',
u'templateavailable': u'Unlimited',
u'templatelimit': u'Unlimited',
u'templateto
Francois,
Bug CLOUDSTACK-5406 was related to snapshot size and secondary storage count.
For your issue, can you paste the response of listAccounts API for the account
you are trying to deploy VM with; this will help us to check the resource_limit
set for your account and what is the
drea...@cloudops.com
> Cc: Sangeetha Hariharan; Sanjay Tripathi
> Subject: RE: CLOUDSTACK-5406
>
> Copying the folks that worked on it
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 3:49 PM
> To: de
@cloudstack.apache.org; fgaudrea...@cloudops.com
Cc: Sangeetha Hariharan; Sanjay Tripathi
Subject: RE: CLOUDSTACK-5406
Copying the folks that worked on it
-Original Message-
From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 3:49 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Copying the folks that worked on it
-Original Message-
From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 3:49 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: CLOUDSTACK-5406
Hi,
I saw this bug as been fixed for the secondary storage limits in 4.3
Hi,
I saw this bug as been fixed for the secondary storage limits in 4.3:
CLOUDSTACK-5406
But it seems to impact the primary storage limit count as well, at least
in 4.2.1. Is the primary storage count fixed in 4.3 (I can't test right
now) as well?
Thanks!
--
Francois Gaudreault
Archi