Dears,
>From past three days, I have been facing issues with usage service in
CS4.3.1 with Xen host 6.2.0
In the CS mgmt server when check with usage service status, it is saying
running. But usage records are not generating in the cloud_usage
In the management-server.log I am getting below erro
our issue solved? The ACS repo you’re using
> is same as upstream 4.3.2 release, including the required. dependencies.
>
>> On 28-Jun-2015, at 7:13 pm, France wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> we are upgrading CS 4.3.1 to 4.3.2 currently.
>>
>&g
France,
Sorry I missed this email. Was your issue solved? The ACS repo you’re using is
same as upstream 4.3.2 release, including the required. dependencies.
On 28-Jun-2015, at 7:13 pm, France
mailto:mailingli...@isg.si>> wrote:
Hi guys,
we are upgrading CS 4.3.1 to 4.3.2 currently.
Of
reports done.
Regards,
F.
On 28 Jun 2015, at 15:43, France wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> we are upgrading CS 4.3.1 to 4.3.2 currently.
>
> Official repo listed on: https://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html which
> is: http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/ is currently down.
&g
Hi guys,
we are upgrading CS 4.3.1 to 4.3.2 currently.
Official repo listed on: https://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html which is:
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/ is currently down.
I was able to find packages on some other mirror:
http://mirrors.coreix.net/cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel
>>>>
> >>>> If these are not correct for CS 4.3.* and XS 6.0.2*, someone please
> let
> >>> us
> >>>> know.
> >>>> Hopefully this mail will help others upgrade, if they see it.
> >>>>
> >>>>
t;>> us
>>>> know.
>>>> Hopefully this mail will help others upgrade, if they see it.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> F.
>>>>
>>>> On 26 Jun 2015, at 11:40, France >
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
will help others upgrade, if they see it.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > F.
> > >
> > > On 26 Jun 2015, at 11:40, France >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Anyone?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 24 Jun
> Hopefully this mail will help others upgrade, if they see it.
>
> Regards,
> F.
>
> On 26 Jun 2015, at 11:40, France wrote:
>
> > Anyone?
> >
> >
> > On 24 Jun 2015, at 15:07, France wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
>
-util
If these are not correct for CS 4.3.* and XS 6.0.2*, someone please let us know.
Hopefully this mail will help others upgrade, if they see it.
Regards,
F.
On 26 Jun 2015, at 11:40, France wrote:
> Anyone?
>
>
> On 24 Jun 2015, at 15:07, France wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
&
Anyone?
On 24 Jun 2015, at 15:07, France wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we got CS 4.3.1 which we will upgrade to 4.3.2 this weekend, using RPMs from
> shapeblue (http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/main/centos/4.3/).
>
> Following the instructions at:
> http://docs.cloudstac
: anil lakineni [mailto:anilkumar459.lakin...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 4:32 PM
>> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Centralized Management console for all tenants on CS
>> 4.3.1..??
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>
console for all tenants on CS 4.3.1..??
Hi All,
Comments are in line,
A quick question, Is there any possibility to stop communication between
two VMs which are using shared network (why because I need communication
between some VMs on this shared network and I don't want communication
between
t; -Original Message-
> From: anil lakineni [mailto:anilkumar459.lakin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 4:32 PM
> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Centralized Management console for all tenants on CS 4.3.1..??
>
> Hi All,
>
: Re: Centralized Management console for all tenants on CS 4.3.1..??
Hi All,
Comments are in line,
A quick question, Is there any possibility to stop communication between
two VMs which are using shared network (why because I need communication
between some VMs on this shared network and I don
no two tenants
> VMs will communicate.
>
> Please can any one suggest me the best possible ways to solve my task.
>
> My CS version is 4.3.1 and XenServer version is 6.2.0
>
> Looking forward for your valuable comments.
>
> Best Regards,
> Anil.
>
nt to monitor those two isloated
account VMs from ROOT account VM." and here main concern is no two tenants
VMs will communicate.
Please can any one suggest me the best possible ways to solve my task.
My CS version is 4.3.1 and XenServer version is 6.2.0
Looking forward for your valuable comme
Ilya,
I have filed the ticket here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8159
Can you provide some more info on that:
1. What is the Hypervisor you are using ?
2. Is it reproproducible, looks like it happens with some VM so probably not ?
If yes, can you outline steps that may re
This is a great workaround, but can we make sure a bug gets filed for
this issue? It'd be nice if we could get it fixed.
--David
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:14 PM, ilya musayev
wrote:
> I've seen an issue where cloudstack would stop some VMs after they have been
> started. Posting the solution for
I've seen an issue where cloudstack would stop some VMs after they have
been started. Posting the solution for whoever comes across this problem.
I've noticed following pattern:
VM was trying to be migrated to another host while another thread would
stop the VM within 10 minutes of the start t
thout resolution). Maybe you can help get a fix in
>> time for 4.3.2 release:
>>
>> Snapshosts errors after upgrade 4.1.1 to 4.3.1:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8013
>>
>> Failed to create a volume from snapshot:
>> https://
rk on 4.3.3 etc.
On Monday 08 December 2014 03:06 PM, France wrote:
Hi Rohit,
Here are a few issues (without resolution). Maybe you can help get a fix in
time for 4.3.2 release:
Snapshosts errors after upgrade 4.1.1 to 4.3.1:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8013
Failed to
Hi Rohit,
Here are a few issues (without resolution). Maybe you can help get a fix in
time for 4.3.2 release:
Snapshosts errors after upgrade 4.1.1 to 4.3.1:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8013
Failed to create a volume from snapshot:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
I have added the additional info as requested.
How can we get someone who knows the code a bit more, to look at the bug report?
Should I send the private mail over to Rohit Yadav, who seems currently to be
working on 3.4.2 release back-porting patches and all?
Thank you.
F.
On 05 Dec 2014, at 15
I'm not a dev but this seems strange:
> 2014-12-03 12:20:46,612 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.a.ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator]
(Job-Executor-166:ctx-d915e890 ctx-d7a11540) Removing pool
Pool[208|IscsiLUN] from avoid set, must have been inserted when searching
for another disk's tag
> 2014-12-03 12:20:46,614 D
Hi guys,
can someone please look at the exemption from the log and confirm this is a bug
and not misconfiguration. If we are on the road to 4.3.2 release, it might get
fixed and included in it.
Thank you!
The bug report is here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8014
Regards,
F.
I added 4.3.2 fixversion in jira and also moved unresolved tickets from
> > 4.1.*, 4.2.*, 4.3.0 and 4.3.1 to 4.3.2
> >
> > jira filter:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CLOUDSTACK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%204.3.2%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%
Thanks Rajani!
How do you add a new version in JIRA, does that require special privileges?
> On 26-Nov-2014, at 10:13 am, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
>
> I added 4.3.2 fixversion in jira and also moved unresolved tickets from
> 4.1.*, 4.2.*, 4.3.0 and 4.3.1 to 4.3.2
>
> ji
I added 4.3.2 fixversion in jira and also moved unresolved tickets from
4.1.*, 4.2.*, 4.3.0 and 4.3.1 to 4.3.2
jira filter:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CLOUDSTACK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%204.3.2%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20
~Rajani
On Mon, Nov 24
e paths please go for it. If it’s already fixed, you can
>> share the SHA with me and I can cherry-pick it and run basic build tests on
>> it.
>>
>>> On 20-Nov-2014, at 3:46 pm, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/20/2014 10:1
20-Nov-2014, at 3:46 pm, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 11/20/2014 10:15 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> We’ve some bugfixes backported to 4.3 branch since 4.3.1 was released
> and I think we should at least support this
share the SHA with me and I can cherry-pick it and run basic build tests on it.
> On 20-Nov-2014, at 3:46 pm, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/20/2014 10:15 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We’ve some bugfixes backported to 4.3 branch since 4.3.1 was r
Hi Alireza,
Thanks for replying.
For the issues that relate to Insufficient server capacity, there could be
multiple reasons. I can help if you can share the specific log where you get
the exception. I would advise you to check cluster level settings (cpu, memory
and storage disable thresholds
On 11/20/2014 10:15 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We’ve some bugfixes backported to 4.3 branch since 4.3.1 was released and I
> think we should at least support this branch with a 4.3.2 release in next
> couple of weeks until a stable 4.5.0 is released in next couple of m
This is not a blocker, but if we have a 4.3.2, I'd be interested in making
a simple update to the SolidFire plug-in.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We’ve some bugfixes backported to 4.3 branch since 4.3.1 was released and
> I think we should at l
Hi,
We’ve some bugfixes backported to 4.3 branch since 4.3.1 was released and I
think we should at least support this branch with a 4.3.2 release in next
couple of weeks until a stable 4.5.0 is released in next couple of months.
I’m going through JIRA and list of issues and will help backport
t.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 10:44 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Patched 4.3.1 SystemVMs (was Re: git commit: updated
> refs/heads/master to 88acc9b)
>
> IMO - Let’s remove httpd.conf, it’s not used anywhere; if people want th
From: Rohit Yadav [rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 10:44 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Patched 4.3.1 SystemVMs (was Re: git commit: updated
refs/heads/master to 88acc9b)
IMO - Let’s remove httpd.conf, it’s not used anywhere; if
hi folks,
I am doing a 4.3.1KVM install on one centOS 6.6 host (mgt + agent).
Trying to setup an advanced zone with two bridges
I have two bridges br0 and br1 which have IPs like so:
br0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet addr:172.16.0.1 Bcast:172.16.0.255 Ma
/CLOUDSTACK-6934,
> >> >>which
> >> >> has been fixed in 4.5.0. The VM to be expunged did not allocate
> >>volume
> >> >>on
> >> >> primary storage.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks
> >> >> -min
t;>which
>> >> has been fixed in 4.5.0. The VM to be expunged did not allocate
>>volume
>> >>on
>> >> primary storage.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >> -min
>> >>
>> >> On 11/6/14 4:57 AM, "Rafael
gt;
> >> On 11/6/14 4:57 AM, "Rafael Weingartner"
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >HI,
> >> >
> >> >Have already someone seen a null pointer when deleting a VM?
> >> >
> >> >I have and environment running for a while w
1/6/14 4:57 AM, "Rafael Weingartner"
>> wrote:
>>
>> >HI,
>> >
>> >Have already someone seen a null pointer when deleting a VM?
>> >
>> >I have and environment running for a while with CS 4.3.1, and today I
>> >tried
>&g
to be expunged did not allocate volume on
> primary storage.
>
> Thanks
> -min
>
> On 11/6/14 4:57 AM, "Rafael Weingartner"
> wrote:
>
> >HI,
> >
> >Have already someone seen a null pointer when deleting a VM?
> >
> >I have and environment
when deleting a VM?
>
>I have and environment running for a while with CS 4.3.1, and today I
>tried
>to delete a VM that was in expunging state but it keeps getting an error:
>
>2014-11-06 10:54:23,473 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
>(Job-Executor-37:ctx-0dd66018 c
HI,
Have already someone seen a null pointer when deleting a VM?
I have and environment running for a while with CS 4.3.1, and today I tried
to delete a VM that was in expunging state but it keeps getting an error:
2014-11-06 10:54:23,473 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-37
> From: Rohit Yadav [rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 4:28 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Patched 4.3.1 SystemVMs (was Re: git commit: updated
> refs/heads/master to 88acc9b)
>
> - user-ML
>
>>
,
then these references can lead to confusion.
Santhosh
From: Rohit Yadav [rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 4:28 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Patched 4.3.1 SystemVMs (was Re: git commit: updated
refs/heads/master to
- user-ML
> On 04-Nov-2014, at 2:52 pm, Santhosh Edukulla
> wrote:
>
> There we mentioned to support only TLS1...etc through + logic
I checked again, where and how is httpd.conf used?
I think this file that is no longer used. I think very old systemvms were build
using a base (CentOS?) linux
> On 04-Nov-2014, at 2:52 pm, Santhosh Edukulla
> wrote:
>
> As well, we may want to just revert the previous changes done to httpd.conf
> to keep the configuration of ciphers consistent across files.
Sure that was a mistake.
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30
From: Rohit Yadav [rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 4:16 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Patched 4.3.1 SystemVMs (was Re: git commit: updated
refs/heads/master to 88acc9b)
Hi Hari,
> On 04-Nov-2014, a
Hi Hari,
> On 04-Nov-2014, at 2:21 pm, Harikrishna Patnala
> wrote:
>
> Regarding the configurations in httpd.conf, they don't apply to apache server
> running in our system vms.
>
> We need to put the configuration in “/etc/apache2/mods-enabled/ssl.conf”, if
> you see apache2.conf it includes
cloudstack.apache.org>
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Patched 4.3.1 SystemVMs (was Re: git commit: updated
refs/heads/master to 88acc9b)
On 04-Nov-2014, at 1:02 pm, Santhosh Edukulla
mailto:santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com>> wrote:
Hi,
> On 04-Nov-2014, at 1:49 pm, Santhosh Edukulla
> wrote:
>
> 2. The conf file changes done will not countermeasure the sytemplate vuln
> issue i believe, we may still wanted to confirm that its indeed the
> httpd.conf which needs to be changed for apache2 as well for the particular
> temp
...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 2:42 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Patched 4.3.1 SystemVMs (was Re: git commit: updated
refs/heads/master to 88acc9b)
> On 04-Nov-2014, at 1:02 pm, Santhosh Edukulla
> wrote:
>
> 2. TLSv1.2 is the
> On 04-Nov-2014, at 1:02 pm, Santhosh Edukulla
> wrote:
>
> 2. TLSv1.2 is the latest to be used and suggested default, ssl protocol and
> the ciphers we use leads to vulnerability, the settings for these as well
> should be available in similar config file. In our code, search for TLS leads
Regards,
Santhosh
From: Rohit Yadav [rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 2:04 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Patched 4.3.1 SystemVMs (was Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master
to 88acc9b
0 and v1.1 have?
Here’s the tool to check POODLE vulnerability on your servers:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/tools/poodle-checker.sh (taken from RedHat)
Patched systemvm template for 4.3.1 that fixes for ShellShock and POODLE:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.3/4.3.1
Regar
bject: Re: Urgent. Importing certificate to CS 4.3.1 using GUI
Hi,
He certainly is :-)
Can you share the screenshot of firebug request and response so as to
diagnose better?
Also, was the upload call made as admin or regular user?
Thanks,
Amogh
On 10/23/14 3:27 AM, "Suresh Sadhu" &g
> Stephen Turner
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vase...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 23 October 2014 16:18
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Urgent. Importing certificate to CS 4.3.1 using GUI
>
> Hi,
>
> He certa
rgent. Importing certificate to CS 4.3.1 using GUI
Hi,
He certainly is :-)
Can you share the screenshot of firebug request and response so as to diagnose
better?
Also, was the upload call made as admin or regular user?
Thanks,
Amogh
On 10/23/14 3:27 AM, "Suresh Sadhu" wrote:
>Thanks
t;implemented will occur.
>
>Regards
>Sadhu
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: France [mailto:mailingli...@isg.si]
>Sent: 23 October 2014 15:43
>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Urgent. Importing certificate to CS 4.3.1 using
which cases this 501 not implemented will
occur.
Regards
Sadhu
-Original Message-
From: France [mailto:mailingli...@isg.si]
Sent: 23 October 2014 15:43
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Urgent. Importing certificate to CS 4.3.1 using GUI
Suresh is awesome. Hope Citrix knows th
Suresh is awesome. Hope Citrix knows that. :-)
We diagnosed the issue with ACS 4.3.1 and Firefox browser, and Suresh will
update this thread with details.
Regards,
F.
On 15 Oct 2014, at 13:55, France wrote:
> Because i do not check this mailing list every day due to actual payed work,
; -Original Message-
> From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 08 October 2014 21:57
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Urgent. Importing certificate to CS 4.3.1 using GUI
>
> Sadhu - Please do update the thread once you have some observati
Sure Nitin and as of now I didn't hear anything from France.
Regards
sadhu
-Original Message-
From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com]
Sent: 08 October 2014 21:57
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Urgent. Importing certificate to CS 4.3.1 using GUI
Sadhu - Plea
ginal Message-
>From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com]
>Sent: 08 October 2014 17:43
>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: RE: Urgent. Importing certificate to CS 4.3.1 using GUI
>
>France, I'm sorry, but I'm about to go away for three weeks, and I'm not
&g
HI France,
I can help today .
My personal email id is mailtosa...@gmail.com
Regards
sadhu
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com]
Sent: 08 October 2014 17:43
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Urgent. Importing certificate to CS 4.3.1 using
ge-
From: France [mailto:mailingli...@isg.si]
Sent: 08 October 2014 11:44
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Urgent. Importing certificate to CS 4.3.1 using GUI
Send me a private email and you can test it on my exact system with all
development options turned on as you wish.
We will do it via r
d do this again, do you
> see any errors?
>
> --
> Stephen Turner
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: France [mailto:mailingli...@isg.si]
> Sent: 26 September 2014 13:44
> To: Stephen Turner
> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Urgent. Impor
Hi guys,
after upgrading ACS from 4.1.1 to 4.3.1 and upgrading XS 6.0.2 to latest
hotfixes and manually replacing NFSSR.py with one from ACS 4.3.1, amongst other
errors, I see this error.
Snapshot is created successfully. I have created templates from it and used
them to create new VMs, but in
ls in Firefox and do this again, do you
see any errors?
--
Stephen Turner
-Original Message-
From: France [mailto:mailingli...@isg.si]
Sent: 26 September 2014 13:44
To: Stephen Turner
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Urgent. Importing certificate to CS 4.3.1 using GUI
Issue
On 26 Sep 2014, at 14:52, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>> The before mentioned process did not work with Firefox 32.0.2, while it
>> worked on latest Chrome.
>> Because the problem is on the browser side, it did not reach management
>> server logs at all.
>> I have done everything correct. Even a
@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Urgent. Importing certificate to CS 4.3.1 using GUI
On Sep 25, 2014, at 9:52 AM, France wrote:
> There is a bug in ACS 4.3.1 GUI.
Do you know if this affects 4.4 and master as well ?
On Sep 25, 2014, at 9:52 AM, France wrote:
> There is a bug in ACS 4.3.1 GUI.
Do you know if this affects 4.4 and master as well ?
> The before mentioned process did not work with Firefox 32.0.2, while it
> worked on latest Chrome.
> Because the problem is on the browser side
Thanks, I've assigned it to myself.
--
Stephen Turner
-Original Message-
From: France [mailto:mailingli...@isg.si]
Sent: 26 September 2014 13:44
To: Stephen Turner
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Urgent. Importing certificate to CS 4.3.1 using GUI
Issue has been creat
tes the problem,
> that would be great just to make sure that we can repro it. Thank you.
>
> --
> Stephen Turner
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: France [mailto:mailingli...@isg.si]
> Sent: 25 September 2014 14:52
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>
4 14:52
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Urgent. Importing certificate to CS 4.3.1 using GUI
There is a bug in ACS 4.3.1 GUI.
The before mentioned process did not work with Firefox 32.0.2, while it worked
on latest Chrome.
Because the problem is on the browser side, it did not reach management server
logs
anything else is broken.
Thanks
Amogh
On 9/25/14 6:52 AM, "France" wrote:
>There is a bug in ACS 4.3.1 GUI.
>The before mentioned process did not work with Firefox 32.0.2, while it
>worked on latest Chrome.
>Because the problem is on the browser side, it did not reach manageme
> Sent: 25 September 2014 19:22
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Urgent. Importing certificate to CS 4.3.1 using GUI
>
> There is a bug in ACS 4.3.1 GUI.
> The before mentioned process did not work with Firefox 32.0.2, while it
> worked on latest Chrome.
>
tack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Urgent. Importing certificate to CS 4.3.1 using GUI
There is a bug in ACS 4.3.1 GUI.
The before mentioned process did not work with Firefox 32.0.2, while it worked
on latest Chrome.
Because the problem is on the browser side, it did not reach management server
logs at
There is a bug in ACS 4.3.1 GUI.
The before mentioned process did not work with Firefox 32.0.2, while it worked
on latest Chrome.
Because the problem is on the browser side, it did not reach management server
logs at all.
I have done everything correct. Even a couple of times. ;-)
Hopefully
I have created new key and csr. Signed it, converted key to pkcs8 format
without encryption and added in ACS GUI with *.domain.tld and again with
domain.tld. I did copy paste the crt and key with and without -BEGIN
CERTIFICATE—— tags. Nothing works. I have the same GUI error message as befor
Tnx Amogh,
i have checked management-server.log and no new entries or errors regarding
certificate operation are written at the time when i get "Failed to update SSL
Certificate." error message. I tried it a couple of times. I also used
somedomain.tld in the GUI. Certificate is for *.somedomain
Hi,
Couple of things :
1. The error will be logged to the cloudstack management server log file
(management-server.log) and would really help to know what it is.
2. While uploading the certificate, the domain_suffix should be
somedomain.tld and not *.somedomain.tld (the asterisk is only for globa
Hi guys,
i want to migrate away from realhostip.com. I have set up DNS service in no
time, but am having problems importing certificates to ACS 3.4.1.
I created my own CA like this:
cd /etc/pki/CA
touch index.txt
echo 1000 > serial
openssl genrsa -aes256 -out /etc/pki/CA/private/ca.key.pem 4096
Hi,
On 24-Sep-2014, at 12:04 pm, France wrote:
> Thank you for your efforts Rohit Yadav.
>
> So i just download the files from:
> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-package-rpm/
> install them by hand, reboot the management server, destroy the routers and
> wait for them
t;> i have upgraded from 4.1.1 to 4.3.1 over the weekend. Amongst other
>> regressions i have found this one:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7517
>>
>> So it looks like it is already well known bug and already has a fix.
>>
>&g
Hi France,
On 22-Sep-2014, at 1:09 pm, France wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> i have upgraded from 4.1.1 to 4.3.1 over the weekend. Amongst other
> regressions i have found this one:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7517
>
> So it looks like it is already we
unnecessary service.
>>
>> 3. secure.somedomain.xxx
>> Static option which would allow us to use a single FQDN certificate. This
>> is acceptable for us, but upon testing with 4.3.1 (restart of ACS,
>> destruction of console proxy SVM) did not link to secure.somedomain
lly an option, due to too high costs of wildcard and
>setting up of another unnecessary service.
>
>3. secure.somedomain.xxx
>Static option which would allow us to use a single FQDN certificate. This
>is acceptable for us, but upon testing with 4.3.1 (restart of ACS,
>destruction
unnecessary service.
3. secure.somedomain.xxx
Static option which would allow us to use a single FQDN certificate. This is
acceptable for us, but upon testing with 4.3.1 (restart of ACS, destruction of
console proxy SVM) did not link to secure.somedomain.xxx.
Before i loose any more time with
Hi guys,
i have upgraded from 4.1.1 to 4.3.1 over the weekend. Amongst other regressions
i have found this one:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7517
So it looks like it is already well known bug and already has a fix.
What can _we_ do to get the fix for 4.3 releases on our
Yes, it worked in 4.3.0.
On 2014.09.17. 20:56, ilya musayev wrote:
Has this worked for you in 4.3.0, before the upgrade to 4.3.1?
I've briefly looked through change log from 4.3.0 to 4.3.1, i dont see
any changes related to console - but this check was very brief.
Regards
ilya
On 9/17/
estroy the
old console proxy VM so that it may configure correctly and open right
port.
HTH
Amogh
On 9/17/14 10:56 AM, "ilya musayev" wrote:
>Has this worked for you in 4.3.0, before the upgrade to 4.3.1?
>
>I've briefly looked through change log from 4.3.0 to 4.3.1,
Has this worked for you in 4.3.0, before the upgrade to 4.3.1?
I've briefly looked through change log from 4.3.0 to 4.3.1, i dont see
any changes related to console - but this check was very brief.
Regards
ilya
On 9/17/14, 1:42 AM, Mārtiņš Jakubovičs wrote:
Hello,
I installed fresh CS
Hello,
I installed fresh CS 4.3.1 and it also don't use
"consoleproxy.url.domain" value.
This is in console proxy, source:
v-2-VMsrc="https://.realhostip.com/ajax?token=1cttHTopOwqQbK_Q9gYmoYMOnzK9fcHUlUv3q6rIUsyVdY3hU7Kmwa7A9RxTz7ZuG4MherlIa0tll
On Sep 16, 2014, at 8:17 AM, France wrote:
> Can I kindly ask for the link for documentation for 4.3.1.
> It is not easy to find it from http://cloudstack.apache.org . All i can find
> is for 4.4.
All docs are at: http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org
Note on the bottom left a green ic
Can I kindly ask for the link for documentation for 4.3.1.
It is not easy to find it from http://cloudstack.apache.org . All i can find is
for 4.4.
Thank you.
Regards.
F.
On 16 Sep 2014, at 14:15, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> O
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/16/2014 02:10 PM, France wrote:
> Do we already have RPMs built for 4.3.1?
>
Yes, they are online at: http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.3/
> On 16 Sep 2014, at 13:41, Sebastien Goasguen
> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>
1 - 100 of 235 matches
Mail list logo