On 5/20/13 6:53 AM, "Murali Reddy" wrote:
>On 20/05/13 7:08 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>
>>On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 08:30:26PM +, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
>>> Hi Murali,
>>>
>>> I found that the table "netscaler_pod_ref" (introduced with your
>>>checkin
>>> 3b1aca19) is missing on the upgrad
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 01:53:00PM +, Murali Reddy wrote:
> On 20/05/13 7:08 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>
> >On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 08:30:26PM +, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
> >> Hi Murali,
> >>
> >> I found that the table "netscaler_pod_ref" (introduced with your checkin
> >> 3b1aca19) is
On 20/05/13 7:08 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 08:30:26PM +, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
>> Hi Murali,
>>
>> I found that the table "netscaler_pod_ref" (introduced with your checkin
>> 3b1aca19) is missing on the upgraded setups. The table was introduced in
>> 40, but it n
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 08:30:26PM +, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
> Hi Murali,
>
> I found that the table "netscaler_pod_ref" (introduced with your checkin
> 3b1aca19) is missing on the upgraded setups. The table was introduced in
> 40, but it never was a part of 302->40 db upgrade. So for custom
Hi Murali,
I found that the table "netscaler_pod_ref" (introduced with your checkin
3b1aca19) is missing on the upgraded setups. The table was introduced in
40, but it never was a part of 302->40 db upgrade. So for customers
upgrading to 4.1 from 3.0.x, this table will be missed.
Could you please
