gt; Regards.
>>
>>
>> From: Rajani K
>> Sent: 18 May 2017 15:50:56
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: Will Stevens; Wido den Hollander
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2
>>
>
y to help over those pending PRs.
Regards.
From: Rajani K
Sent: 18 May 2017 15:50:56
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Will Stevens; Wido den Hollander
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2
These are the pending PRs for RC3:
https://github.c
Thanks Rajani,
I'll try to help over those pending PRs.
Regards.
From: Rajani K
Sent: 18 May 2017 15:50:56
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Will Stevens; Wido den Hollander
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2
These are the pending PR
ssues blocking the 4.10.0.0 release?
Regards.
From: Tutkowski, Mike
Sent: 12 May 2017 01:53:44
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Will Stevens; Wido den Hollander
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2
Hi Rajani,
I opened the following PR (against maste
[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2
Hi Rajani,
I opened the following PR (against master) to fix the blocker CLOUDSTACK-9917:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2098
Thanks!
Mike
On 5/10/17, 10:40 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote:
Thanks for testing Mike.
RC3=RC2+P
Hi Rajani,
I opened the following PR (against master) to fix the blocker CLOUDSTACK-9917:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2098
Thanks!
Mike
On 5/10/17, 10:40 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote:
Thanks for testing Mike.
RC3=RC2+PR#2089+Mike'sPR
Any other additions?
@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Will Stevens; Wido den Hollander
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2
Thanks for testing Mike.
RC3=RC2+PR#2089+Mike'sPR
Any other additions?
~ Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
On May 10, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Tutkowski, Mike
(mike.t
Hi,
I went ahead and opened the following PR:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2096
Talk to you later!
Mike
On May 10, 2017, at 9:26 PM, Tutkowski, Mike
mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>> wrote:
Hi,
I analyzed the problematic PR and fixed the issue this way:
https://github.com/mike
Today I am working on this PR. Hopefully I will complete it.
Yesterday fixed test_01_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes_egress_true,
test_01_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes_egress_false. Today working on RVR
related tests.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On May 11, 2017, at 10:38 AM, Will Stevens
mai
HI, Rajani
I think these 4 are ready and good for merging into RC3.
CLOUDSTACK-9690: Scale CentOS7 VM fails with error #1849
CLOUDSTACK-9017 : VPC VR DHCP broken for multihomed guest VMs #2082
CLOUDSTACK-9824: Resource count for Primary storage is considered twice - while
creating and while a
Is 1866 ready? It looks like CI is failing on a lot of relevant network
tests.
On May 11, 2017 12:48 AM, "Jayapal Uradi"
wrote:
Hi Rajani,
Also please include the PR#1866.
Thanks,
Jayapal
> On May 11, 2017, at 10:10 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
>
> Thanks for testing Mike.
>
> RC3=RC2+PR#2089
Hi Rajani,
Also please include the PR#1866.
Thanks,
Jayapal
> On May 11, 2017, at 10:10 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
>
> Thanks for testing Mike.
>
> RC3=RC2+PR#2089+Mike'sPR
>
> Any other additions?
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On May 10, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Tutkowski,
Thanks for testing Mike.
RC3=RC2+PR#2089+Mike'sPR
Any other additions?
~ Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
On May 10, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Tutkowski, Mike
(mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:
I've been running regression tests against the release candidate.
So far, all tests but one have
Hi,
I analyzed the problematic PR and fixed the issue this way:
https://github.com/mike-tutkowski/cloudstack/commit/c463057c82656a4d7564fc9205bb79517317c629
If a couple people could take a look at this code and see what you think, I can
create a PR against the RC and we can make use of this cod
OK, here’s the gist of the problem:
In StorageManagerImpl.cleanupStorage(boolean), the following line in 4.9
List vols = _volsDao.listVolumesToBeDestroyed(new
Date(System.currentTimeMillis() - ((long) StorageCleanupDelay.value() << 10)));
was changed to the following in 4.10
I've been running regression tests against the release candidate.
So far, all tests but one have passed.
The failing test is related to the storage cleanup thread. It looks like some
code was changed in 4.10 with regards to this thread and that change is causing
a problem around cleanup for man
I agree to your concerns Wido. I did check the PR before creating
RC2. There were some outstanding comments on it.
If no one has started testing RC2 and there are no objections, we
can cancel this vote, quickly merge the PR and create RC3.
~ Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
On May 10
> Op 10 mei 2017 om 0:33 schreef Will Stevens :
>
>
> Just to clarify. Wido, the issue you are experiencing is only with basic
> networks and also exists in 4.9 right? The issue becomes noticeable when
> you have a lot of networks. Is that a fair statement?
Well, the provisioning is the same be
Just to clarify. Wido, the issue you are experiencing is only with basic
networks and also exists in 4.9 right? The issue becomes noticeable when
you have a lot of networks. Is that a fair statement?
On May 9, 2017 5:39 PM, "Wido den Hollander" wrote:
> +0
>
> I don't want to VOTE -1 due to a bu
+0
I don't want to VOTE -1 due to a bug we are facing, but for us 4.10 would be a
problem due to the VR performance.
A PR is open for this, but I also don't want to delay 4.10 any longer:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2089
Technically the VR works, it is just that deployment is utt
Hi All,
I've created a 4.10.0.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=fadc80d50f9e95012c9ff3644b60b600c6f65204
Commit:fadc80d50f9e95012c9ff3644b60b600c6f65204
Branch: 4.10.0.0-RC20170509T1030
21 matches
Mail list logo
