On 18/04/13 6:29 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 05:49:23PM -0700, Sheng Yang wrote:
>> In fact that's the requirement for this design. We need this very strict
>> restriction to implement isolation for the VMs. PVLAN is the way we
>>used to
>> approach this requirement.
>
>As
d.com]
Sent: 18 April 2013 02:00
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][FS]PVLAN for isolation within a VLAN
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 05:49:23PM -0700, Sheng Yang wrote:
> In fact that's the requirement for this design. We need this very strict
> restriction to implement isola
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 05:49:23PM -0700, Sheng Yang wrote:
> In fact that's the requirement for this design. We need this very strict
> restriction to implement isolation for the VMs. PVLAN is the way we used to
> approach this requirement.
As a user, the whole point of this type of network is to
In fact that's the requirement for this design. We need this very strict
restriction to implement isolation for the VMs. PVLAN is the way we used to
approach this requirement.
Community VLAN is more like normal VLANs, which shared the information in
between. That's not of our concern currently.
T
Sheng,
Thanks for the FS. Couple of points in FS that made me curious of the
rational behind it.
Why do you want to all the end user VM's (except for DHCP server VM) in
shared network to be connected only to I-port's. This means that even VM's
of same user can not talk to each other, right? Is'nt
Hi all,
I am current working on a new mechanism to archive isolation for advance
shared network. It took advantage of PVLAN feature of Cisco switch, to
achieve isolation using a simpler way.
Here is the FS. You probably need to read references(in the link) to get an
idea of PVLAN first.
https://
