Re: [REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service

2014-03-14 Thread Will Stevens
t; *To:* Edison Su > *Cc:* dev@cloudstack.apache.org; David Nalley ( > da...@gnsa.us) > *Subject:* Re: [REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service > > > > Lets say that we have the following setup to help clarify how this all > works. > > > > CloudStack

Re: [REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service

2014-03-14 Thread Marcus
h 13, 2014 7:16 PM > To: Edison Su > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; David Nalley (da...@gnsa.us) > Subject: Re: [REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service > > Lets say that we have the following setup to help clarify how this all works. > > CloudStack Managemen

RE: [REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service

2014-03-14 Thread Edison Su
[mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Will Stevens Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 7:16 PM To: Edison Su Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; David Nalley (da...@gnsa.us) Subject: Re: [REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service Lets say that we have the following setup to help clarify how

Re: [REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service

2014-03-13 Thread Will Stevens
Su > *Cc:* dev@cloudstack.apache.org; David Nalley ( > da...@gnsa.us) > *Subject:* Re: [REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service > > > > What are you referring to as the 'v1.0 url hack'? Bypassing the > cloudstack management server is an intentional d

RE: [REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service

2014-03-13 Thread Edison Su
13, 2014 5:52 PM To: Edison Su Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; David Nalley (da...@gnsa.us) Subject: Re: [REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service What are you referring to as the 'v1.0 url hack'? Bypassing the cloudstack management server is an intentional design decision to

Re: [REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service

2014-03-13 Thread Will Stevens
What are you referring to as the 'v1.0 url hack'? Bypassing the cloudstack management server is an intentional design decision to improve performance. The introduction of a load balancer in front of the two distinct services to maintain separation of their traffic is a good thing. I will review

[REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service

2014-03-13 Thread Edison Su
One comment on the "/v1.0" url hack, seems changing mgt server is unavoidable, would it be easier to add a new api in cloudstack, which can get the endpoint of swift server and the auth? And the UI change should be put under ui plugin: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/UI+P

Re: [REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service

2014-03-12 Thread David Nalley
Hi Will: This looks interesting; and I am thrilled to see it. PLUpload is GPLv2 - which likely at best limits us to noredist inclusion. I haven't yet looked at this in-depth, just got that far in reading the spec. --David On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > Hello Everyone, >

[REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service

2014-03-12 Thread Will Stevens
Hello Everyone, I would like your opinion on the work I have done to integrate OpenStack Swift into CloudStack as an Object Storage Service available to the end users. *Functional Spec:* https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/OpenStack+Swift+as+Object+Storage+Service *Jira Ticket: