Kindly let me know your comments to the changes.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Sonal Ojha wrote:
> Please take a look.
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Sonal Ojha
> Date: Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:07 PM
> Subject: Re: Review Request 18677: CLOUDSTACK-3272
> To: Murali Reddy ,
Please take a look.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sonal Ojha
Date: Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: Review Request 18677: CLOUDSTACK-3272
To: Murali Reddy , Chiradeep Vittal <
chirade...@gmail.com>
Cc: Sonal Ojha , cloudstack <
dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
This is an a
Thanks Sonal. I understand the requirement but not the use case where this
is needed, so was curious.
-Nitin
On 18/03/14 3:03 AM, "Sonal Ojha" wrote:
>Hello Nitin,
>
>There was a requirement to control the publishing of events on the
>messaging queue as opposed to how it is currently. At presen
Hello Nitin,
There was a requirement to control the publishing of events on the
messaging queue as opposed to how it is currently. At present, all events
by default gets published over the queue. The idea was to have control over
the types of events being published in the queue not necessarily as
Can you please explain why would one want to restrict publishing certain
kind of events ? Performance ?
On 17/03/14 9:44 PM, "Sonal Ojha" wrote:
>Any updates?
>
>
>On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Sonal Ojha
>wrote:
>
>> Kindly let me know your review comments.
>>
>> -- Forwarded messa
Any updates?
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Sonal Ojha wrote:
> Kindly let me know your review comments.
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Sonal Ojha
> Date: Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:20 AM
> Subject: Re: Review Request 18677: CLOUDSTACK-3272
> To: Sonal Ojha , cloudstack <
>
Kindly let me know your review comments.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sonal Ojha
Date: Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:20 AM
Subject: Re: Review Request 18677: CLOUDSTACK-3272
To: Sonal Ojha , cloudstack <
dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply
