Re: [QUESTION] @ReflectionUse

2014-11-28 Thread Laszlo Hornyak
Hi, How about declaring those methods "package protected"? With that it is still not considered a public api, but findbugs does not detect it as a bug. Also, it would be nice to have some javadoc on these methods on how they are used, what calls them, etc... On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Daa

Re: [QUESTION] @ReflectionUse

2014-11-28 Thread Daan Hoogland
Are we going to (and can we) add functionality to make the code quality tools recognise it? (or is it just there to ignore? On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > It came in through the discussion on this thread > http://markmail.org/message/j7ird7yzb3pvszbw > > > ~Rajani > > O

Re: [QUESTION] @ReflectionUse

2014-11-27 Thread Rajani Karuturi
It came in through the discussion on this thread http://markmail.org/message/j7ird7yzb3pvszbw ~Rajani On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Min Chen wrote: > If I understand this clearly, this annotation was introduced by Kelven to > prevent people from mistakenly removing those annotated methods

Re: [QUESTION] @ReflectionUse

2014-11-27 Thread Min Chen
If I understand this clearly, this annotation was introduced by Kelven to prevent people from mistakenly removing those annotated methods if they find from IDE that those methods are not explicitly called anywhere. These methods are actually invoked through reflection. Thanks -min > On Nov 2

[QUESTION] @ReflectionUse

2014-11-27 Thread Daan Hoogland
H Kelven (or others), What are the plans with this annotation, ReflectionUse. Is there to be an implementation or folow up or is it maybe just there to ignore? -- Daan