lto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2013 1:38 PM
>> To: dev
>> Subject: Re: [Proposal] Improve VR upgrades
>>
>> At Schuberg Philis we are looking at supporting HA redundant virtual routers
>> to be able to upgrade without any downti
Balancing, and others
with it then it becomes orders of magnitude harder to get right.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2013 1:38 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [Proposal] Improve VR upgrades
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, 4 October 2013 2:08 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [Proposal] Improve VR upgrades
>
> At Schuberg Philis we are looking at supporting HA redundant virtual routers
> to
> be
At Schuberg Philis we are looking at supporting HA redundant virtual
routers to be able to upgrade without any downtime. I don't think there is
any other way to go in the future, for multi-tenant corporate environments.
Upgrading will then mean destroying the redundant pair one by one while
waitin
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:47:57AM +, Kishan Kavala wrote:
> During CS upgrade, VRs are required to be upgraded to use newer systemVm
> template .
> The current VR upgrade procedure has following limitations:
> - takes 'long' time and the time exponentially increases with the size of
> the
During CS upgrade, VRs are required to be upgraded to use newer systemVm
template .
The current VR upgrade procedure has following limitations:
- takes 'long' time and the time exponentially increases with the size of the
cloud
- no way to sequence upgrade of different parts of the cloud, i.e.,
