Re: [Proposal] Concerning open PRs

2016-02-25 Thread Syed Mushtaq
gt; > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > > > Nux! > > www.nux.ro > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Paul Angus" > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > > Sent: Saturday, 20 February, 2016 12:31:56 >

Re: [Proposal] Concerning open PRs

2016-02-25 Thread Will Stevens
PR" RPMs! > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > - Original Message - > > From: "Paul Angus" > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Sent: Saturday, 20 February, 2016 12:31:56 > > Subject: R

Re: [Proposal] Concerning open PRs

2016-02-20 Thread Nux!
+1 for "on PR" RPMs! -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Paul Angus" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Saturday, 20 February, 2016 12:31:56 > Subject: RE: [Proposal] Concerning open

RE: [Proposal] Concerning open PRs

2016-02-20 Thread Paul Angus
on its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. -Original Message- From: Wilder Rodrigues [mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2016 8:40 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subjec

Re: [Proposal] Concerning open PRs

2016-02-20 Thread Wilder Rodrigues
ilto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 2:07 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Proposal] Concerning open PRs > > >> On Feb 18, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Wilder Rodrigues >> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> It’s

RE: [Proposal] Concerning open PRs

2016-02-19 Thread Ramanath Katru
: Thursday, February 18, 2016 2:07 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [Proposal] Concerning open PRs > On Feb 18, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Wilder Rodrigues > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > It’s been a long time, but the Wolverine is not dead yet. ;) > > Currently we have 1

Re: [Proposal] Concerning open PRs

2016-02-18 Thread Jeff Hair
I think that requiring everyone to test a pull request before opening a new one will just grind development to a halt. Although it has to be done, nobody likes testing. Automated testing relieves a lot of this, and many of the pull requests are involved enough to require extensive manual/integratio

Re: [Proposal] Concerning open PRs

2016-02-18 Thread sebgoa
> On Feb 18, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Wilder Rodrigues > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > It’s been a long time, but the Wolverine is not dead yet. ;) > > Currently we have 175 opened PRs, which we all agree to be a lot, given the > fact that few people, if any, are testing/merging them. I have been a bit

[Proposal] Concerning open PRs

2016-02-17 Thread Wilder Rodrigues
Hi all, It’s been a long time, but the Wolverine is not dead yet. ;) Currently we have 175 opened PRs, which we all agree to be a lot, given the fact that few people, if any, are testing/merging them. I have been a bit off the radar, but from next week I will start helping to get some of those