Re: [PROPOSAL] Support pure Xen as a hypervisor

2014-03-20 Thread Marco Sinhoreli
+1 Marco Sinhoreli Consultant Manager Phone: +55 21 2586 6390 | Fax: +55 21 2586 6002 | Mobile: +55 21 98276 3636 Praia de Botafogo 501, bloco 1 - sala 101, Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brazil - CEP 22250-040 marco.sinhor...@shapeblue.com| www.shapeblue.com

Re: [PROPOSAL] Support pure Xen as a hypervisor

2014-03-19 Thread Nguyen Anh Tu
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:56 PM, sebgoa wrote: > IMHO, and sadly, we should treat them as two different hypervisors: XP and > XS Look like Docker and LXC :D --Tuna

Re: [PROPOSAL] Support pure Xen as a hypervisor

2014-03-19 Thread sebgoa
On Mar 19, 2014, at 7:04 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:40:04AM -0400, Tim Mackey wrote: >> Historically CloudStack has used Xen and XenServer interchangeably to refer >> to any XenAPI based implementation. With the recent release of Xen Project >> 4.4 (http://blog.x

Re: [PROPOSAL] Support pure Xen as a hypervisor

2014-03-18 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:40:04AM -0400, Tim Mackey wrote: > Historically CloudStack has used Xen and XenServer interchangeably to refer > to any XenAPI based implementation. With the recent release of Xen Project > 4.4 (http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2014/03/10/xen-4-4-released/), and > interest

Re: [PROPOSAL] Support pure Xen as a hypervisor

2014-03-18 Thread Nux!
On 18.03.2014 16:48, sebgoa wrote: +1 in general, I am not sure what would be best between libvirt and libxl though. but as you know there might be a quick path to reuse the KVM agent and use libvirt to interact with xenproject +1 XenProject +1 Reuse KVM/libvirt agent Good ideas! :) -- Sent

Re: [PROPOSAL] Support pure Xen as a hypervisor

2014-03-18 Thread sebgoa
On Mar 18, 2014, at 4:40 PM, Tim Mackey wrote: > Historically CloudStack has used Xen and XenServer interchangeably to refer > to any XenAPI based implementation. With the recent release of Xen Project > 4.4 (http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2014/03/10/xen-4-4-released/), and > interest in alterna

RE: [PROPOSAL] Support pure Xen as a hypervisor

2014-03-18 Thread Stephen Turner
40 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [PROPOSAL] Support pure Xen as a hypervisor Historically CloudStack has used Xen and XenServer interchangeably to refer to any XenAPI based implementation. With the recent release of Xen Project 4.4 (http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2014/0

[PROPOSAL] Support pure Xen as a hypervisor

2014-03-18 Thread Tim Mackey
Historically CloudStack has used Xen and XenServer interchangeably to refer to any XenAPI based implementation. With the recent release of Xen Project 4.4 (http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2014/03/10/xen-4-4-released/), and interest in alternate architectures like ARM, the loose definition of our Xen