Re: [PROPOSAL] Storage plug-in for 4.2

2013-05-31 Thread Mike Tutkowski
No problem! :) On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote: > Mike, > Thanks a lot! > > -Wei > > 2013/5/31, Mike Tutkowski : > > Hi Wei, > > > > Thanks! > > > > Here are the details you requested. This also talks about Min and Max > IOPS. > > > > Please let me know if you'd like more inform

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storage plug-in for 4.2

2013-05-31 Thread Wei ZHOU
Mike, Thanks a lot! -Wei 2013/5/31, Mike Tutkowski : > Hi Wei, > > Thanks! > > Here are the details you requested. This also talks about Min and Max IOPS. > > Please let me know if you'd like more information. I have an entire > document I could share with you regarding SolidFire QoS (the info be

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storage plug-in for 4.2

2013-05-31 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Hi Wei, Thanks! Here are the details you requested. This also talks about Min and Max IOPS. Please let me know if you'd like more information. I have an entire document I could share with you regarding SolidFire QoS (the info below is taken from this document). Talk to you later! How does Soli

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storage plug-in for 4.2

2013-05-31 Thread Wei ZHOU
Mike, good work. I notice the burst IOPS. Do you know the mechanism and the config of it, like the duration and interval burst IO? Thanks. -Wei 2013/5/31, Mike Tutkowski : > Hi everyone, > > I apologize for being unfamiliar with how I should have gone about getting > consensus for the storage pl

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storage plug-in for 4.2

2013-05-31 Thread John Burwell
Mike, Excellent. Thanks, -John On May 31, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi John, > > I think this is the link you'll need: > > https://reviews.apache.org/r/11479/ > > Thanks! :) > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:45 AM, John Burwell wrote: > Mike/Animesh, > > I am happy to re

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storage plug-in for 4.2

2013-05-31 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Hi John, I think this is the link you'll need: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11479/ Thanks! :) On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:45 AM, John Burwell wrote: > Mike/Animesh, > > I am happy to review. However, other $dayjob duties may prevent me from > getting to it until Monday. Has the patch been pu

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storage plug-in for 4.2

2013-05-31 Thread John Burwell
Mike/Animesh, I am happy to review. However, other $dayjob duties may prevent me from getting to it until Monday. Has the patch been pushed into Review Board? Thanks, -John On May 31, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi Animesh, > > Sure, I'd be happy to do that. > > Would you

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storage plug-in for 4.2

2013-05-31 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Hi Animesh, Sure, I'd be happy to do that. Would you like these comments in this e-mail chain, the design doc, and/or the JIRA ticket? Also, just to make sure I understand correctly when we refer to "dependencies" here, the plug-in simply requires the storage-framework changes that Edison put in

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storage plug-in for 4.2

2013-05-30 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
Mike don't feel bad it's my fault I think everyone knew you were working on the plugin actively and I assumed the proposal was already in place. Can you call out your dependencies on Edison's framework? John I added as you as reviewers for Mike's contribution, can you pass on your comments.

[PROPOSAL] Storage plug-in for 4.2

2013-05-30 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Hi everyone, I apologize for being unfamiliar with how I should have gone about getting consensus for the storage plug-in I developed for 4.2. I talked with Animesh and he has asked me to send out this proposal related to the storage plug-in I built for 4.2 and submitted to Review Board earlier t