Re: [PROPOSAL][CLOUDSTACK-768] ACL on private gateway

2013-04-09 Thread Jayapal Reddy Uradi
- >> From: Chiradeep Vittal >> Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2013 3:49 AM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Cc: Jayapal Reddy Uradi; Abhinandan Prateek; Kishan Kavala >> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL][CLOUDSTACK-768] ACL on private gateway >> >> This depends on the

RE: [PROPOSAL][CLOUDSTACK-768] ACL on private gateway

2013-03-31 Thread Jayapal Reddy Uradi
a > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL][CLOUDSTACK-768] ACL on private gateway > > This depends on the changes proposed in the ACL deny rules feature. Can > you re-word taking into account the new proposed APIs? > > On 3/28/13 12:46 AM, "Abhinandan Prateek" > > wrote: &

Re: [PROPOSAL][CLOUDSTACK-768] ACL on private gateway

2013-03-29 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
This depends on the changes proposed in the ACL deny rules feature. Can you re-word taking into account the new proposed APIs? On 3/28/13 12:46 AM, "Abhinandan Prateek" wrote: >+1, thanks for proposing and working on this feature. > >On 28/03/13 11:32 AM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" > wrote: > >>I wou

Re: [PROPOSAL][CLOUDSTACK-768] ACL on private gateway

2013-03-28 Thread Abhinandan Prateek
+1, thanks for proposing and working on this feature. On 28/03/13 11:32 AM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" wrote: >I would like to propose the new feature ACL on private gateway. >This feature is sub feature of the nTier 2.0 apps. > >Currently we do not have way to control the traffic on the private >gat

[PROPOSAL][CLOUDSTACK-768] ACL on private gateway

2013-03-27 Thread Jayapal Reddy Uradi
I would like to propose the new feature ACL on private gateway. This feature is sub feature of the nTier 2.0 apps. Currently we do not have way to control the traffic on the private gateway. Using this feature we can configure the ingress/egress ACL on the private gateway. Jira Id: https://issu