kiranchavala commented on PR #67:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/67#issuecomment-3290493258
> @kiranchavala - updates on these errors:
>
> `cloudstack_secondary_storage`, did you terraform apply maintenance mode
before running destroy? If you set th
kiranchavala merged PR #67:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/67
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-uns
poddm commented on PR #67:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/67#issuecomment-3285847306
`cloudstack_secondary_storage`, did you terraform apply maintenance mode
before running destroy? If you set the state on create to maintenance, its
only available in the
kiranchavala commented on PR #67:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/67#issuecomment-3278289404
Thanks @poddm for the suggestion
Henceforth, we will check the pr for proper naming conventions
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servi
poddm commented on PR #67:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/67#issuecomment-3277202517
@kiranchavala, I saw the devlist you were releasing v0.6.0. I'd like to get
traction here - i've had this PR open for quite awhile and am using it in our
internal fork.
vishesh92 closed pull request #67: Zonewizard
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/67
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscrib
poddm opened a new pull request, #67:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/67
Zone wizard resources:
- cloudstack_zone
- cloudstack_pod
- cloudstack_cluster
- cloudstack_physical_network
- cloudstack_traffic_type
- cloudstack_storage_pool
- cl
poddm commented on PR #67:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/67#issuecomment-2444965080
@rohityadavcloud @vishesh92. This is now rebased and updated to the latest
cloudstack library.
the ACC tests are failing here. Is there a way to bypass this stora
rohityadavcloud commented on PR #67:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/67#issuecomment-2424695061
@poddm can you review/rebase the PR & look at failing tests. Thanks.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, pl
rohityadavcloud commented on PR #67:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/67#issuecomment-2078605458
@poddm can you address conflicts on the PR?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
poddm commented on PR #67:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/67#issuecomment-2078546167
> @poddm could you please help in resolving the conflicts
Update - I'd still like to get these merged once the cloudstack SDK is
updated.
- https://github.com/ap
kiranchavala commented on PR #67:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/67#issuecomment-1980094048
@poddm could you please help in resolving the conflicts
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
poddm commented on PR #67:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/67#issuecomment-1830540072
Added additional resources
1. cloudstack_vlan_ip_range
2. cloudstack_network_service_provider_state
This also requires the following `cloudstack-go` ch
poddm commented on code in PR #67:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/67#discussion_r1362603135
##
cloudstack/provider.go:
##
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ func Provider() terraform.ResourceProvider {
ResourcesMap: map[string]*schema.Resource{
14 matches
Mail list logo
