-
> From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On
> Behalf Of Will Stevens
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 1:51 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [Merge] Palo Alto Networks firewall integration to master
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to merge support f
[mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Will Stevens
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 1:51 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [Merge] Palo Alto Networks firewall integration to master
Hi,
I would like to merge support for Palo Alto Network's firewall appliances to
the master branch. Developmen
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 06:59:25PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> mvn --projects='org.apache.cloudstack:cloudstack'
> org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.8:check
s/0.8/0.10 if you want the latest
tils/HttpClientWrapper.java
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com]
> On
> > > > > Behalf Of Will Stevens
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday,
>
> >
> plugins/network-elements/palo-alto/src/com/cloud/network/utils/HttpClientWrapper.java
> > >
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On
> > > > Behalf Of Will Stevens
&
013 10:51 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Merge] Palo Alto Networks firewall integration to master
>
> Just so I know, can you explain what it means to 'Fail RAT'? Thx...
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
>
> > Fixed.
> &
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 10:15 AM
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Merge] Palo Alto Networks firewall integration to master
> > >
> > > Great! Thank you Sheng...
> > >
> > >
>
From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On
> > Behalf Of Will Stevens
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 10:15 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [Merge] Palo Alto Networks firewall integration to master
> >
> > Great! Thank y
AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Merge] Palo Alto Networks firewall integration to master
>
> Great! Thank you Sheng...
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
>
> > Looks good to me.
> >
> > Applied to MASTER branch. Thanks!
>
Great! Thank you Sheng...
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
> Looks good to me.
>
> Applied to MASTER branch. Thanks!
>
> --Sheng
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Will Stevens
> wrote:
>
> > @Sheng: This should be ready to go now. I built the patch from
> tonight's
> >
Looks good to me.
Applied to MASTER branch. Thanks!
--Sheng
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Will Stevens wrote:
> @Sheng: This should be ready to go now. I built the patch from tonight's
> master and I included a more detailed commit message as you requested. Let
> me know if you have any
@Sheng: This should be ready to go now. I built the patch from tonight's
master and I included a more detailed commit message as you requested. Let
me know if you have any questions/problems...
@David: As per this discussion (and a previous one [1]), I have moved this
code from being built wit
Thanks for that David. You are absolutely correct, this plugin has no
dependencies on any 3rd party code at build or runtime. Everything the
plugin requires is built into the plugin. I was unclear if its dependance
on a 3rd party API and appliance to be functional was relevant.
I think you are
So perhaps a bit of history.
nonoss/noredist is for targets that aren't built 'by default' (e.g.
you must explicitly turn them on). We do this because the ASF wants
the default build to be truly unencumbered and where there are
dependencies on non-open source, or non-Apache compatible code, we
typ
Its dependence on a third party API and appliance, similar to the srx and
netscaler. I am not convinced it should be in noredist, but I was following
the same model as other similar plugins. Feedback on this would be
helpful.
Ws
On Tuesday, November 5, 2013, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4,
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Will Stevens wrote:
> Sheng, I will rebuild the patch for the latest master. The latest master
> has depreciated the 'nonoss' flag in favour of 'noredist'. I was building
> in nonoss previously. I am guessing I should use the noredist flag now?
>
Will - what is ca
Sheng, I will rebuild the patch for the latest master. The latest master
has depreciated the 'nonoss' flag in favour of 'noredist'. I was building
in nonoss previously. I am guessing I should use the noredist flag now?
Cheers,
Will
On Monday, November 4, 2013, Sheng Yang wrote:
> Sure, I would
Sure, I would be glad to commit it for 4.3 release.
--Sheng
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:59:30AM -0500, Will Stevens wrote:
> > Well its not in master yet. That is the intent of this thread...
> >
> > I can definitely do some testing for the
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:59:30AM -0500, Will Stevens wrote:
> Well its not in master yet. That is the intent of this thread...
>
> I can definitely do some testing for the 4.3 test cycle.
>
> Will
Shoot, I misread Sheng's email. Sorry about that. I thought he said
that he "Checked *in*" the
Well its not in master yet. That is the intent of this thread...
I can definitely do some testing for the 4.3 test cycle.
Will
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:49:29AM -0500, Will Stevens wrote:
> > Anything I can do to help get this patch int
Anything I can do to help get this patch into 4.3.0?
Thanks,
Will
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
> Nice work Will!
>
> I've checked the code, it included the UI part and unit test as well.
> Really impressed!
>
> Just one comment: you can git-format-patch to generate the pa
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:49:29AM -0500, Will Stevens wrote:
> Anything I can do to help get this patch into 4.3.0?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Will
If it's in master, it'll be in 4.3... so help by testing during the 4.3
test cycle!
-chip
Great, thank you Sheng...
I have updated the diff for the patch review with a new version which was
created using the 'git format-patch' format.
A note that may help others. I found this very helpful when squashing my
branch of changes to a patch for master:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/61
Nice work Will!
I've checked the code, it included the UI part and unit test as well.
Really impressed!
Just one comment: you can git-format-patch to generate the patch. It would
includes author and description information automatically, which is easier
for applying.
+1!
--Sheng
On Thu, Oct
Hi,
I would like to merge support for Palo Alto Network's firewall appliances
to the master branch. Development for this has been done by Will Stevens
at CloudOps on branch [1].
There was an introduction [2], a proposal [3], and a discussion [4] on the
mailing list regarding this feature.
Check
25 matches
Mail list logo
