[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Reimplement router.redundant.vrrp.interva...

2016-05-18 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1486 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Reimplement router.redundant.vrrp.interva...

2016-05-16 Thread GabrielBrascher
Github user GabrielBrascher commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1486#issuecomment-219561259 Based on code review and the documentation cited by @remibergsma, the code LGTM. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Reimplement router.redundant.vrrp.interva...

2016-05-16 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1486#issuecomment-219541268 This one is ready to merge. I would love another code review on this one as it is green and the CI is clean... --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply t

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Reimplement router.redundant.vrrp.interva...

2016-05-13 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1486#issuecomment-219160164 Ok, we need one more review on this. tag:needsreview tag:needreview --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply app

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Reimplement router.redundant.vrrp.interva...

2016-05-13 Thread DaanHoogland
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1486#issuecomment-219157668 LGTM, tag:easypr --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Reimplement router.redundant.vrrp.interva...

2016-05-13 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1486#issuecomment-219082129 This one is looking pretty good. Can we get some code review on it so we can move it forward. Thanks... --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Reimplement router.redundant.vrrp.interva...

2016-05-13 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1486#issuecomment-219031280 Resolved conflict --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Reimplement router.redundant.vrrp.interva...

2016-05-12 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1486#issuecomment-218811415 @remibergsma sorry to do this to you again. can you force push again. I have pushed fixes to jenkins and travis this morning so hopefully we can get this all green.

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Reimplement router.redundant.vrrp.interva...

2016-05-12 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1486#issuecomment-218783498 Force pushed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Reimplement router.redundant.vrrp.interva...

2016-05-06 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1486#issuecomment-217605326 ### CI RESULTS ``` Tests Run: 85 Skipped: 0 Failed: 0 Errors: 0 Duration: 8h 49m 25s ``` **Associ

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Reimplement router.redundant.vrrp.interva...

2016-05-02 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1486#issuecomment-216228086 @remibergsma can do a push -f again, Travis failed --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Reimplement router.redundant.vrrp.interva...

2016-05-01 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1486#issuecomment-216030568 Also force pushed this one again. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Reimplement router.redundant.vrrp.interva...

2016-04-30 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1486#issuecomment-215988010 @swill force pushed --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Reimplement router.redundant.vrrp.interva...

2016-04-12 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1486#issuecomment-208909441 I am not sure what is going on with Jenkins and Travis now days, but they are being very flaky. Maybe the added load of people being more active is messing with them

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Reimplement router.redundant.vrrp.interva...

2016-04-12 Thread remibergsma
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1486#issuecomment-208793335 @swill force pushed --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Reimplement router.redundant.vrrp.interva...

2016-04-10 Thread remibergsma
GitHub user remibergsma opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1486 Reimplement router.redundant.vrrp.interval setting Global setting `router.redundant.vrrp.interval` is not used any more and it is now set to a hardcoded 1. This results in a failo