[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Kvm plugin restructure

2016-05-17 Thread DaanHoogland
Github user DaanHoogland closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1521 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feat

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Kvm plugin restructure

2016-05-17 Thread wido
Github user wido commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1521#issuecomment-219775425 At this moment I don't see the benefit of doing a restructure as it will kill any current work for somebody working on something in KVM. I personally thing we

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Kvm plugin restructure

2016-05-17 Thread DaanHoogland
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1521#issuecomment-219653710 I will rebase again, if we do want this. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If you

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Kvm plugin restructure

2016-05-17 Thread wido
Github user wido commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1521#issuecomment-219651833 I am not against it, but we have more KVM Pull Requests open like #1545 At what point do we ask other PRs to be rebased after this one merges in? --- If your

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Kvm plugin restructure

2016-05-13 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1521#issuecomment-219101062 We have merge conflicts on this one. As soon as the merge conflicts are sorted out, I will run CI against it and hopefully we can get some code reviews quickly so we

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Kvm plugin restructure

2016-05-13 Thread DaanHoogland
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1521#issuecomment-219049934 @rhtyd @jburwell @wido @swill Are we not doing this? I see no :-1: but also no LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Kvm plugin restructure

2016-04-28 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1521#issuecomment-215552234 @DaanHoogland please rebase as master has caused merge conflicts... --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on Gi

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Kvm plugin restructure

2016-04-28 Thread DaanHoogland
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1521#issuecomment-215446492 Enjoying the discussion I would like to -1 for the entire refactor all at once. I changed this project because it was feasible and convenient. I can see myself

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Kvm plugin restructure

2016-04-28 Thread jburwell
Github user jburwell commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1521#issuecomment-215438021 I would love to dump Maven for Gradle. However, I agree with @wido -- we currently have much higher priorities to address. For me, it is fun to banter a bit abou

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Kvm plugin restructure

2016-04-28 Thread wido
Github user wido commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1521#issuecomment-215347141 I am not against this restructure perse. But shall we not try to change to many things at once? We have enough on our plates, so talking about leaving Maven se

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Kvm plugin restructure

2016-04-27 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1521#issuecomment-215191105 @DaanHoogland I'm not sure about others, but gradle has become most popular and widely-support in modern java development @jburwell agree, the discussion here is t

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Kvm plugin restructure

2016-04-27 Thread DaanHoogland
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1521#issuecomment-215183202 + 1 for moving away from maven. How about sbt? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well.

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Kvm plugin restructure

2016-04-27 Thread jburwell
Github user jburwell commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1521#issuecomment-215177976 @rhtyd +1 for Gradle though it would be a large undertaking. Since Gradle's Java plugin natively supports Maven's directory structure, such a transition would act

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Kvm plugin restructure

2016-04-27 Thread DaanHoogland
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1521#issuecomment-215176727 @rhtyd I agree we should. At the moment we are already in an intermediate state. Some projects were moved to maven standard (I only know utils by head and the

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Kvm plugin restructure

2016-04-27 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1521#issuecomment-215172757 In my experience when you are doing a lot of backporting or forward-porting work, if a plugin/module has got its filesystem structure (for example, due to moving to m

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Kvm plugin restructure

2016-04-27 Thread DaanHoogland
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1521#issuecomment-215131396 @swil @rhtyd this is the follow up of #1348. The initial rat failure was genuine but next files where found that are .gitignored. not sure what happened --- I

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Kvm plugin restructure

2016-04-27 Thread DaanHoogland
GitHub user DaanHoogland opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1521 Kvm plugin restructure test and project restructure without functional implications You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Daa