Github user ghxandsky closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/74
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
Github user ghxandsky commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/74#issuecomment-73816188
Yes, this is good idea.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
We discussed this very thing awhile back, and decided the correct fix
was to have the storage drivers contain a method that would decide if
a pool type is capable of thin provisioning. It's a bigger fix than
this though.
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:27 PM, ghxandsky wrote:
> GitHub user ghxandsky op
GitHub user ghxandsky opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/74
Cloudstack doesn't consider storage overprovisioning factor when using t...
...hin Provisioning over ShareMountPoint with KVM.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: