Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/634
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/634#issuecomment-125912564
@wilderrodrigues agreed. we can take it up as a new issue
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/634#issuecomment-125912381
LGTM :+1:
@karuturi, should we perhaps create an issue to follow up on this? I think
we should refactor the early-config a bit and, as you mentioned
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/634#issuecomment-125910552
looks good :+1: but, should this processing be part of the
setup_[router|vpcrouter|dhcpserver] itself?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/634#issuecomment-125895559
Awesome, @kishankavala!
Will wait for the build/travis to vote/merge it.
Cheers,
Wilder
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
GitHub user kishankavala opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/634
CLOUDSTACK-8683: process cmd_line.json for shared network VR in
cloud-early-config
- SSH access on link_local_ip is blocked for shared VR
- MS is unable to program rules on VR. Vm deplo