Github user bvbharatk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/899
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 100
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=72
Failed=1
Skipped=3
_Link to logs Folder (se
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/899#issuecomment-216195030
@yvsubhash please rebase against latest master and push -f, update on
status of your PR; please squash changes into single commit
tag:easypr
---
If your proj
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/899#issuecomment-150838585
@yvsubhash Please squash the commits and rebase with current master, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
repl
Github user remibergsma commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/899#discussion_r41290357
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/Xenserver625StorageProcessor.java
---
@@ -544,6 +546,9 @@ public
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/899#issuecomment-145154881
@yvsubhash Please update the title of the PR to be more descriptive.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user wido commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/899#discussion_r40903392
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/Xenserver625StorageProcessor.java
---
@@ -544,6 +546,9 @@ public Answer
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/899#issuecomment-144683655
Hi @yvsubhash
Is there any integration test to cover this change? What would be the steps
for us to test it?
Cheers,
Wilder
---
If yo
GitHub user yvsubhash opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/899
BUG-ID:CLOUDSTACK-8921
Summary: CLOUDSTACK-8921
snapshot_store_ref table should store actual size of back snapshot in
secondary storage
Calling SR scan to make sure size is update
