Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
thank you sir. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
Thanks @swill @jayapalu for the work. I'll build a new systemvmtemplate to
use with upcoming Trilian tests on master/4.10+.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and h
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
It has required LGTMs and tests. I am merging this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@deepthimachiraju remember that you need a new system vm built from this PR
for this functionality to work.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user deepthimachiraju commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@swill Would do some basic testing of the PR and update the results.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
Here is another set of tests run to validate all the settings (in addition
to the normal tests).
```
++++---+---+--
]
Sent: vrijdag 10 februari 2017 09:27
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1741: Updated StrongSwan VPN
Implementation
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@swill I have tested this PR with systemvm template with
VENetherlands
@shapeblue
-Original Message-
From: jayapalu [mailto:g...@git.apache.org]
Sent: vrijdag 10 februari 2017 09:27
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1741: Updated StrongSwan VPN Implementation
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@swill I have tested this PR with systemvm template with strongswan
installed long back. The s2s vpn worked fine.
LGTM from my side.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply t
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@DaanHoogland: yes, I want it run in Trillian, but my understanding is that
manual steps need to be taken in the test setup for Trillian in order to first
build the SystemVM from this PR and then
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@swill I know and work needs done. On the other hand, you mentioned you
wanted to see this run in trillian. You still want that? Else I will skip
and just review the code tomorrow.
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@DaanHoogland did you make the test run in Trillian install a SystemVM
built from this PR? If you didn't it won't actually be a valid test run...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can re
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
I started a build yesterday but am not at my computer today. I'll look at
the results later.
Biligual auto correct use. Read at your own risico
On 8 Feb 2017 4:58 pm, "
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
Here is the CI run for this PR using my KVM Bubble environment. This CI
run is using a SystemVM built from this PR branch (required for a valid test)
and since we have not been able to do that wi
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
### CI RESULTS
```
Tests Run: 87
Skipped: 1
Failed: 4
Errors: 0
Duration: 9h 13m 51s
```
**Summary of the problem(s):**
```
FAIL:
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@DaanHoogland I don't think this will work. I think you have to manually
specify a SystemVM template built from this PR in order for the tests to work.
I don't think a SystemVM from this PR is u
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@DaanHoogland a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has
been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-474
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@DaanHoogland a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep
you posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
rep
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@borisstoyanov thanks. Yes, that explains why there are failures. When I
ran my tests, I did it with a system VM built from this PR:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741#issuecomment-2
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@swill blueorangutan package builds a yum repo from the PR, but it doesn't
build new system vms, we'll need to build them manually, build an env with the
packages, update the ssvm and kick
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
Rebased against current master to try to fix new issues with tomcat.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
I am curious. For the Trillian tests, is a new SystemVM being being built
with this PR and that system VM is being used for the test? This PR requires a
new system VM template, so if that is not
Sorry, been swamped. I need to fix our Jenkins to support Java 8 to be able
to continue validation on Java 8.
On Jan 31, 2017 1:48 AM, "rhtyd" wrote:
> Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
>
> Ping, update on this?
>
>
> ---
> If yo
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
Ping, update on this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
Thanks @PaulAngus. I have been side tracked recently. I need to get our
Jenkins fixed to be able to build with Java 8 to be able to test the latest
rebase to see if anything changed due to that
Github user PaulAngus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
I ran the failing test suite against 4.9.2 - and everything passed
Test Site 2 Site VPN Across redundant VPCs ... === TestName:
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Status : SUCCESS ===
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
Trillian test result (tid-785)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x1), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 34369 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
It is likely my environment. I had some connectivity issues in this envs
when I was using them before. I have a pretty recent master in, but I can
relate tonight to be sure. Can we kick off your CI to see what yours says?
On Jan 21, 2017 2:24 AM, "PaulAngus" wrote:
> Github user PaulAngus commen
Github user remibergsma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@PaulAngus Sounds like an old bug? This PR was supposed to fix it and is
merged: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1483
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this e
Github user PaulAngus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
hi @remibergsma , the design puts the same MAC on the two VPC routers.
XenServer doesn't seem to like this. (ESXi hosts give a specific warning).
@swill have you pulled in the updated marvi
Github user remibergsma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@swill OK, check. Shouldn't be dependent on hypervisor type I'd say.
Anyway, when I find some time I'll spin master and have a look. All I can say
is that we run quite a bunch of them withou
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@remibergsma last time we tested rvr we had a lot of problems and have not
yet been able to adopt it. @pdion891 do you have any details on this? I am not
sure if we have tested it recently.
---
Github user remibergsma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@PaulAngus Out of curiosity, why wouldn't rVPCs work properly on XenServer?
As far as I know it works fine, but I may have missed your point.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
This set of test was run on KVM. I am not sure of the current state of RVR
in general, so I can run this PR again because some of those issues were SSH
connectivity issues (which could be env rel
Github user PaulAngus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
Any failures relating to rVPC maybe can't be completely ignored but the
design of the rVPC means that it will not work under XenServer or vSphere, so
tests will fail under those hypervisors.
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
I don't believe any of these issues are related to the StrongSwan feature...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
### CI RESULTS
```
Tests Run: 87
Skipped: 1
Failed: 6
Errors: 0
Duration: 9h 25m 26s
```
**Summary of the problem(s):**
```
FAIL:
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
I don't think we should try to support non-DH connections since they are
security risk. DH should be required. I have made it required in the UI and
have added a bunch of additional hashing and
I am going to try something today to see if I can try to find a way to
support non-DH connections. I will let you know.
On Jan 3, 2017 9:02 AM, "rhtyd" wrote:
> Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
>
> @swill thanks, looking forward
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@swill thanks, looking forward to getting this in 4.10. I'm not sure about
any side-effects and regressions of the DH-group related change, I think if
it's not supported we should remove the optio
I will do a final round of testing in the next couple days and squash the
commits as you asked. Sorry for the delay. It has been running in prod for
the last month or so and it is going well.
Strongswan does not support leaving the DH group empty. Should I remove
that as an option from the UI and
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@swill @jayapalu updates on this, is this good to go?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@swill can you squash your commits and use the JIRA id in the commit
summary.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If yo
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@rhtyd yes I know. I am not pushing for this to be in 4.10. I will be
pushing for it to go into 4.11 right away, but I know how hard it is to wrap
things up as we get close to freeze. Your doing
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
Thanks @swill but at this time, the scope of testing this and building a
new systemvmtemplate is limited. Given the declared hard freeze, we can target
this for 4.11, and I can help with tests aga
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
We are running this PR as well as #1706 in production and the merge
conflict for merging the two PRs together is quite complicated. Because we had
to do the merge conflict for our production of t
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@jayapalu were you working off the latest version of my PR? I have fixed
the issue of the IP being out of order on reboot in this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
Rebased again because changes in #1659 caused the fixes to
`systemvm/patches/debian/config/opt/cloud/bin/cs_ip.py` to conflict...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
Rebased against master and fixed merge conflicts...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@jayapalu Can you expand on your findings regarding public ip order? Did
you pull in the latest PR with the fixes from @swill?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@rhtyd
While testing this feature public ip order change on reboot issue blocked
this.
My suggestion is that public ip out of order is different issue. If vpn
functionalities working e
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@swill @jayapalu thanks for your work, can you rebase against latest
master, fix the conflicts. Also use the JIRA id in the git commit summary.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can repl
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@murali-reddy I have tested with Isolated Guest Networks. The problem that
we experienced with the SourceNAT IP not being primary on the public nic if
more than one public IP exists does not exis
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@murali-reddy I will check isolated guest networks today.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user murali-reddy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@jburwell No, I have fixed issue with static nat on any public IP
associated in case of multiple public interfaces.
@swill Is there any possibility of public IP going out of order f
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@murali-reddy did you also fix some issues around source NAT?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
I have isolated and fixed the issue where the reboot through the API
results in the Remote Access VPN no longer working if either a PF rule or
Static NAT rule is defined. The problem existed beca
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
I am troubleshooting an issue right now behaves as follows.
- I create a VR and connect with the Remote Access VPN and everything works.
- I create a Port Forwarding rule on that VR, Remote
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
Thanks guys. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@swill I will test with latest template in the coming week
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
I've built systemvm templates with strongswan here:
http://hydra.scale.ninja/strongswan
The links/server may be taken down in few weeks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-111
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@swill I've kicked new systemvmtemplate build jobs based on your PR, I've
also included @wido 's systemvm template to include qemu-guest-agent from #1545
: https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@swill we had lost our Jenkins setup, while I've built all I could not get
a systemvmbuilder job setup yet, so let me do that first so we can build
systemvmtemplates once again. blueorangutan acts
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@rhtyd & @jburwell this PR requires a new System VM template to function.
I have a XenServer test environment which I have been using where I deploy RPMs
and the System VM which I build with Jenk
70 matches
Mail list logo
