Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
LGTM. The one failing test is due to environment issue, I've fixed it and
will send a PR shortly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
yes. I am merging this now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@rhtyd @karuturi I think we are good to go on this PR now. Do you agree?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Trillian test result (tid-178)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 25671 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Any way to easily just re-run test_05_stop_ssvm and test_07_reboot_ssvm?
I'm not sure how this PR would cause such failures. The only changed Java
code does the following:
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@karuturi @mike-tutkowski the oobm related error was an env issue, the
vpc/vr related failures are know (and fixes are on its way). I'm not sure what
to make of the ssvm/storage related failures.
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@blueorangutan @rhtyd How are we on this PR? are the failures related? Or
can I go ahead and merge this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply a
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Trillian test result (tid-164)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 38976 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Trillian test result (tid-162)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 33772 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoran
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
2016-10-23 19:32:49,315 - CRITICAL - EXCEPTION: test_05_stop_ssvm:
['Traceback (most recent call last):\n', ' File
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 369, in run\ntestMeth
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
==
FAIL: Create a redundant VPC with two networks with two VMs in each network
--
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Tests out-of-band management change password feature ... === TestName:
test_oobm_zchange_password | Status : FAILED ===
FAIL
That might be a problem with the test.
---
If yo
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Trillian test result (tid-163)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 25326 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt
+ vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@blueorangutan test matrix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Looks like re-pushing the commit did the trick, @rhtyd. I think we are good
to go here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@rhtyd I changed the SHA and re-pushed the commit. Hopefully that will
clear up Travis.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-79
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
LGTM. @mike-tutkowski can you check why Travis failed?
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user koushik-das commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@mike-tutkowski If the LGTMs are there, this can get merged. There are lot
of comments so difficult to go through all of them.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this em
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Just following up on this one. Is there any pending work item that remains
or are we able to merge? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@jburwell Excellent...closing and re-opening the ticket fixed the CI issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Closing and re-opening the PR fixed the Travis issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
I still got a weird Travis failure, so I decided to close and re-open this
PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Travis, which was failing for a similar reason for #1600, passed, so I will
(once again) change the commit SHA and re-push. In fact, while I'm at it, I'll
rebase it against the latest fro
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@jburwell @mike-tutkowski looks like marvin fails to get installed
properly, one of the dependency fails with following:
Command "/opt/python/2.7.10/bin/python2.7 -u -c "import setuptools
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@rhtyd any ideas?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes s
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@jburwell I think it's Travis. I've changed the commit SHA twice now and it
failed both times plus it fails with #1600, as well (even though I pushed that
one multiple times, too). Not su
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@mike-tutkowski The Travis build is failing with the following error:
```
0.04s$ ./tools/travis/script.sh ${TESTS}
Running tests: smoke/test_usage_events smoke/test_vm_life_cycl
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Travis issue?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@karuturi awaiting feature enhancement to blueorangutan which was delayed
due to an medical emergency. Also, I want to wait to perform further testing
until #1692 is tested and merged as it fi
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@blueorangutan @jburwell any update on the tests?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Thanks for running that, @serg38!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
LGTM testing on Vmware hardware. RHEL 6 management servers, ESX 5.5 and 6
hypervisors, advanced networking
```
test DeployVM in anti-affinity groups for project ... === TestName:
test_De
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Great!! Hopefully, we can merge this by Monday then.
This is one of the good PRs we have with good description, screenshots,
demo, new tests and test runs by author. (Thanks @mike-tutkowski
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@karuturi discussing with @rhtyd being able to specify a list of additional
component tests to blueorgantan on the test command. Hopefully, we can get
something together by tomorrow (23 Sept 2
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
That is great. Let us wait for @blueorangutan to post the results.
There still is a pending request for 'system VM integration test suites
(SSVM, CPVM, and VR)'
---
If your project is
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@jburwell a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs56sp1, centos7
mgmt + vmware55u3, ubuntu mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@mike-tutkowski @karuturi I have asked blueorganutan to test this PR across
VMware, KVM, and XenServer (I accidentally told it to all 3).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@blueorangutan test matrix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@blueorangutan matrix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wish
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@jburwell I never asked you to remove your -1. I am not even trying to
convince you to remove your -1.
If Vmware + nfs is such an important combination, it should be the
prerequisite for
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@jburwell Let me run those tests next week (probably Monday) as I'm just
about ready to head out on a flight to a customer site for an upcoming meeting
and won't be back until the weekend
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@mike-tutkowski I only see results for the new test suites for XenServer +
Managed Storage. Have you also run the entire smoke test suite with
`require_hardware` set to `true`? If so, could y
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@karuturi I am not going to debate the commonality of VMware. It is the
market leader in the hypervisor space, and NFS is one of the most popular
storage protocols used with it. Like the gene
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@jburwell 'most commonly deployed' - I doubt.
As @blueorangutan is ready to test, we can wait. In general, waiting for
test results on a configuration which no one has(Hardware is hard), ju
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@karuturi VMware with NFS primary/secondary storage. It is one of the most
commonly deployed CloudStack configurations. Therefore, I am -1 on merging
this PR until this regression test is per
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@mike-tutkowski and @jburwell I think nobody has the test configurations
requested. There is no point waiting indefinitely on a configuration which
nobody has or wants to test. Let wait for 2
Thanks, Sergey!
On 9/21/16, 5:37 PM, "Sergey Levitskiy" wrote:
@mike-tutkowski @nvazquez We can probably run it this week
On 9/21/16, 12:11 PM, "mike-tutkowski" wrote:
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/
@mike-tutkowski @nvazquez We can probably run it this week
On 9/21/16, 12:11 PM, "mike-tutkowski" wrote:
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Thank you, @karuturi!
Does anyone know who
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Thank you, @karuturi!
Does anyone know who can run the VMware test that @jburwell asked for? I
can't due to this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9144
(but
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
I already posted the results for that configuration(a comment form
@cloudmonger with test results) its all good there.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and hav
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@karuturi That config is actually one of the ones John is asking for. :)
Smoke test suite + system VM integration test suites (SSVM, CPVM, and VR)
against XenServer using Unmanage
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@mike-tutkowski sorry mike. 2.b(xen+unmanaged) is what I ran. I dont have
others.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
57 matches
Mail list logo
