Id=68720798
[3]: https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html
On 5/14/25 03:48, Rohit Yadav wrote:
I've made my position clear, if there's no scope for further discussion I'll
add my vote.
Thanks.
From: João Jandre
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2025 19:08
To:
I've made my position clear, if there's no scope for further discussion I'll
add my vote.
Thanks.
From: João Jandre
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2025 19:08
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discussion] Versioning
Hello Rohit,
> I thin
amp; security releases. The LTS/hypervisor support
is a good example and also optimisations, critical/security issues examples we've delivered
in past maintenance releases that required DB changes (both data & schema).
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LTS
[2] https://cwiki.apach
amples we've delivered in
past maintenance releases that required DB changes (both data &
schema).
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LTS
[2]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=68720798
Regards.
____
From: Jo
//cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=68720798
Regards.
________
From: João Jandre
Sent: Friday, May 9, 2025 00:19
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discussion] Versioning
Hello, Rohit
I'm very sorry to hear that your country is at war.
ntenance/minor & security releases.
Regards.
From: João Jandre
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 22:40
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discussion] Versioning
Hi everyone,
As it seems we have no objections to the proposed changes to our
versioning, I'll be starting a v
25 22:40
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discussion] Versioning
Hi everyone,
As it seems we have no objections to the proposed changes to our
versioning, I'll be starting a voting thread to vote on the changes to
the versioning process that were discussed on this thread.
Once the firs
Hi everyone,
As it seems we have no objections to the proposed changes to our
versioning, I'll be starting a voting thread to vote on the changes to
the versioning process that were discussed on this thread.
Once the first subject is decided (the process to follow and guide the
release proce
Hi Joao,
Thanks for bringing this back to discussion.
I largely agree with the proposed ideas and I think waiting for the
release after 4.21 should give us enough time to communicate this
properly. I agree with Daan's view about the transition not being that
big if we omit the 4. from the release
Hi Daan,
On 5/1/25 09:22, Daan Hoogland wrote:
The biggest reasons lately people have had to roll back afaics were
unforseen side effects of enhancements, not interface changes. That
doesn't negate the importance of being careful with breaking changes,
but as the one exception I think we must al
João,
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 9:06 PM João Jandre wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to revisit the topic of versioning, particularly in light
> of our last discussion (see
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/hnzp6hnsjyj8593cf6tbgryt1s8z5glq). It
> seems that most people here agree with the i
Hi everyone,
I would like to revisit the topic of versioning, particularly in light
of our last discussion (see
https://lists.apache.org/thread/hnzp6hnsjyj8593cf6tbgryt1s8z5glq). It
seems that most people here agree with the idea of transitioning to a
new major version (e.g., from 4.x to 5.0)
12 matches
Mail list logo
