> On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 2:36 PM Nicolas Vazquez <
> nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > I don't have a preference either, but the work you are proposing
on your
> > PR makes sense to me.
> >
> >
M Nicolas Vazquez <
> > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Daniel,
> > >
> > > I don't have a preference either, but the work you are proposing
> on your
> > > PR makes sense to me.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > I don't have a preference either, but the work you are proposing on your
> > PR makes sense to me.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Nicolas Vazquez
> >
> >
> > From: Rohit
peblue.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > I don't have a preference either, but the work you are proposing on your
> > PR makes sense to me.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Nicolas Vazquez
> >
> > _
t; PR makes sense to me.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Nicolas Vazquez
>
>
> From: Rohit Yadav
> Sent: Wednesday, September 8, 2021 5:05 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Discussion] String libs
>
> I don't have any specific
__
From: Daniel Augusto Veronezi Salvador
Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 04:37
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [Discussion] String libs
Hi all,
Currently, the main String libs we are using are "commons.lang" and
"commons.lang3" (either directly or by our facade, &qu
el Augusto Veronezi Salvador
Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 04:37
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [Discussion] String libs
Hi all,
Currently, the main String libs we are using are "commons.lang" and
"commons.lang3" (either directly or by our facade, "co
Hi all,
Currently, the main String libs we are using are "commons.lang" and
"commons.lang3" (either directly or by our facade, "com.cloud.utils"). We have
a current discussion about using them directly or via a facade (such as
"com.cloud.utils"); however, a third implementation has been added
