RE: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes

2013-04-15 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 6:05 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath > Subject: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes > > Hi

Re: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes

2013-04-15 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013, at 02:31 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > I'm just wondering how we want to handle the case where review never > happens, or not in time for a scheduled release. I agree with Joe that > there's no point reverting an entire feature just because its docs were > not reviewed, but I'

Re: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes

2013-04-15 Thread Jessica Tomechak
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Rajesh Battala wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > > Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 7:47 PM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [DOCS] Document

RE: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes

2013-04-15 Thread Rajesh Battala
> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 7:47 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes > > On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 06:05:48PM

RE: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes

2013-04-15 Thread Radhika Puthiyetath
-Original Message- From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 4:36 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes On Sun, Apr 14, 2013, at 02:19 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: > Any penalties for peo

Re: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes

2013-04-15 Thread Chip Childers
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 06:05:48PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Sun, Apr 14, 2013, at 02:19 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: > > Any penalties for people who BLOCK documentation development ? > > Are there rewards for the folks who aren't blocking documentation > development? It's not like we c

Re: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes

2013-04-14 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013, at 02:19 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: > Any penalties for people who BLOCK documentation development ? Are there rewards for the folks who aren't blocking documentation development? It's not like we can dock their volunteer pay. ;-) In all seriousness - I'm sure that it's

RE: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes

2013-04-14 Thread Radhika Puthiyetath
Puthiyetath Subject: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes Hi all, I've observed Radhika struggling to get reviews of her feature docs, and having to work to provide patch after patch for reviewboard submissions. I have a proposal (which I think Joe hinted at in another t

Re: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes

2013-04-11 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013, at 08:04 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > I've observed Radhika struggling to get reviews of her feature docs, and > having to work to provide patch after patch for reviewboard submissions. > > I have a proposal (which I think Joe hinted at in another thread): Indeed. > Doc wri

[DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes

2013-04-11 Thread Chip Childers
Hi all, I've observed Radhika struggling to get reviews of her feature docs, and having to work to provide patch after patch for reviewboard submissions. I have a proposal (which I think Joe hinted at in another thread): Doc writers with commit rights shouldn't use reviewboard to elicit reviews