Re: [DISCUSS] blocker issue 3646 for 4.14/4.13.1

2020-02-07 Thread Andrija Panic
ks. My vote would be that it is a blocker, as there is no way to >> > >> clean up and so storage filling up and crashing is a very real >> > possibility. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> paul.an...@shapeblue.com >> > >> www.shapeblu

Re: [DISCUSS] blocker issue 3646 for 4.14/4.13.1

2020-02-04 Thread Andrija Panic
gt; > possibility. > > >> > > >> > > >> paul.an...@shapeblue.com > > >> www.shapeblue.com > > >> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK > > >> @shapeblue > > >> > > >> > > >> > >

Re: [DISCUSS] blocker issue 3646 for 4.14/4.13.1

2020-02-04 Thread Daan Hoogland
t; >> paul.an...@shapeblue.com > >> www.shapeblue.com > >> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK > >> @shapeblue > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Andrija Panic &

Re: [DISCUSS] blocker issue 3646 for 4.14/4.13.1

2020-02-04 Thread Gabriel Beims Bräscher
on WC2E 9DPUK >> @shapeblue >> >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Andrija Panic >> Sent: 03 February 2020 16:58 >> To: dev >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] blocker issue 3646 for 4.14/4.13.1 >> >> I believe not - i.e. y

Re: [DISCUSS] blocker issue 3646 for 4.14/4.13.1

2020-02-03 Thread Gabriel Beims Bräscher
February 2020 16:58 > To: dev > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] blocker issue 3646 for 4.14/4.13.1 > > I believe not - i.e. you can go and delete the files manually (but in some > cases there is also records not properly removed from the > snapshots_store_ref, for either primary or seco

RE: [DISCUSS] blocker issue 3646 for 4.14/4.13.1

2020-02-03 Thread Paul Angus
: Andrija Panic Sent: 03 February 2020 16:58 To: dev Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] blocker issue 3646 for 4.14/4.13.1 I believe not - i.e. you can go and delete the files manually (but in some cases there is also records not properly removed from the snapshots_store_ref, for either primary or secondary kind

Re: [DISCUSS] blocker issue 3646 for 4.14/4.13.1

2020-02-03 Thread Andrija Panic
.@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK > @shapeblue > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Andrija Panic > Sent: 03 February 2020 16:35 > To: dev > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] blocker issue 3646 for 4.14/4.13.1 >

RE: [DISCUSS] blocker issue 3646 for 4.14/4.13.1

2020-02-03 Thread Paul Angus
-Original Message- From: Andrija Panic Sent: 03 February 2020 16:35 To: dev Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] blocker issue 3646 for 4.14/4.13.1 This issue is here from before (i.e. not new to 4.14), so we can argue it's not technically a blocker due to regression happening in some pre

Re: [DISCUSS] blocker issue 3646 for 4.14/4.13.1

2020-02-03 Thread Andrija Panic
This issue is here from before (i.e. not new to 4.14), so we can argue it's not technically a blocker due to regression happening in some previous release, and I can live with it being moved to 4.15. That being said, would be great to see it solved if this rings any bells for anyone who might have

[DISCUSS] blocker issue 3646 for 4.14/4.13.1

2020-02-03 Thread Daan Hoogland
People, A ticket has been raised as a blocker but i don't think anybody here has the resources to fix it. It is a regression of kinds, and a known issue but in my not so humble opinion won't block anybody from using a future release. The Issue [1] describes the problem and a PR [2] gives a partial