an in the orchestration layer.
--
Stephen Turner
-Original Message-
From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:r...@remi.nl]
Sent: 28 May 2015 12:53
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] XenServer and HA: the way forward
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for getting in touch!
First of all, good to hear we agree th
>
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:r...@remi.nl]
> Sent: 04 May 2015 11:04
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] XenServer and HA: the way forward
>
> Hi all,
>
> Since CloudStack 4.4 the implementation of HA in CloudStac
ent: 04 May 2015 11:04
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] XenServer and HA: the way forward
Hi all,
Since CloudStack 4.4 the implementation of HA in CloudStack was changed to use
the XenHA feature of XenServer. As of 4.4, it is expected to have XenHA enabled
for the pool (not for the VMs!
> > XenServer 6.0.2.!
> > Can somebody give more information on this?
> >
> > Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards,
> >
> > Swen Brüseke
> >
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Remi Bergsma [mailto:r...@remi.nl]
> > Gesendet: Die
et: Dienstag, 5. Mai 2015 12:36
> An: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] XenServer and HA: the way forward
>
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for pointing me to the proposal, Koushik. Too bad no one responded
> to such a major change.
>
> When I put my "Opera
ebody give more information on this?
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards,
Swen Brüseke
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Remi Bergsma [mailto:r...@remi.nl]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Mai 2015 12:36
An: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] XenServer and HA: the way forwa
Hi all,
Thanks for pointing me to the proposal, Koushik. Too bad no one responded
to such a major change.
When I put my "Operations" hat on, I see several issues. First of all,
there was no mention of this change in the release notes. Not as a new
feature, nor as a bug that was fixed. How do we e
2015 08:12
An:
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] XenServer and HA: the way forward
The below is the proposal for switching to XenServer HA.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-dev/201403.mbox/%3c83f77ff1bd50194ab65afa5479d082a71e4...@sjcpex01cl02.citrite.net%3E
On 04-May-2015, at 9:03 PM
The below is the proposal for switching to XenServer HA.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-dev/201403.mbox/%3c83f77ff1bd50194ab65afa5479d082a71e4...@sjcpex01cl02.citrite.net%3E
On 04-May-2015, at 9:03 PM, Tim Mackey wrote:
> Thanks for starting this thread Remi.
>
> From my
Thanks for starting this thread Remi.
>From my perspective the pros of simply enabling XenServer HA are:
- automatic election of pool master in the event of hardware failure
- automatic fencing of a host in the event of dom0 corruption
- automatic fencing of a host in the event of heartbeat failu
Hi all,
Since CloudStack 4.4 the implementation of HA in CloudStack was changed to
use the XenHA feature of XenServer. As of 4.4, it is expected to have XenHA
enabled for the pool (not for the VMs!) and so XenServer will be the one to
elect a new pool master, whereas CloudStack did it before. Also
11 matches
Mail list logo
