Yes, nice work!
From: Daan Hoogland
Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 5:28 AM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] VR upgrade downtime reduction
good work Rohit,
I'll review 2508 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2508
On Tue,
can be driven towards making all VRs redundant enabled by
> default that can allow for a firewall+connections state transfer
> (conntrackd + VRRP2/3 based) during rolling reboots.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
>
>
>
> ___
Thursday, February 8, 2018 3:11:51 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] VR upgrade downtime reduction
to stop the vote and continue the discussion. I personally want unification
of all router vms: VR, 'shared network', rVR, VPC, rVPC, and eventually the
one we want to create for 'enterpr
> From: "Rene Moser"
> > To: "dev"
> > Sent: Wednesday, 7 February, 2018 10:11:45
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] VR upgrade downtime reduction
>
> > On 02/06/2018 02:47 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote:
> >> Hi Daan,
> >>
> >> In my opi
+1 too
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Rene Moser"
> To: "dev"
> Sent: Wednesday, 7 February, 2018 10:11:45
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] VR upgrade downtime reduction
> On 02/06/2018
On 02/06/2018 02:47 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote:
> Hi Daan,
>
> In my opinion the biggest issue is the fact that there are a lot of different
> code paths: VPC versus non-VPC, VPC versus redundant-VPC, etc. That's why you
> cannot simply switch from a single VPC to a redundant VPC for example.
>
>
>
> Paul Angus
>
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 07 February 2018 08:58
> To: dev
&
Sent: 07 February 2018 08:58
To: dev
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] VR upgrade downtime reduction
Reading all the reactions I am getting wary of all the possible solutions that
we have.
We do have a fragile VR and Remi's way seems the only one to stabilise it.
It also answers the question on
Reading all the reactions I am getting wary of all the possible solutions
that we have.
We do have a fragile VR and Remi's way seems the only one to stabilise it.
It also answers the question on which of my two tactics we should follow.
Wido's abjection may be valid but services that are not star
Hi Remi,
Actually in our fork, there are more changes than restartnetwork and
restart vpc, similar as your changes.
(1) edit networks from offering with single VR to offerings with RVR, will
hack VR (set new guest IP, start keepalived and conntrackd, blablabla)
(2) restart vpc from single VR to RV
looking forward to your blog(s), Remi. sound like you guys are still having
fun.
PS did you review your PR, i submitted for you ;) ?
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Remi Bergsma
wrote:
> Hi Daan,
>
> In my opinion the biggest issue is the fact that there are a lot of
> different code paths: VPC
Hi Daan,
In my opinion the biggest issue is the fact that there are a lot of different
code paths: VPC versus non-VPC, VPC versus redundant-VPC, etc. That's why you
cannot simply switch from a single VPC to a redundant VPC for example.
For SBP, we mitigated that in Cosmic by converting all non
On 02/06/2018 12:28 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
I'm afraid I don't agree on some of your comments, Wido.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 02/05/2018 04:44 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
H devs,
I have recently (re-)submitted two PRs, one by Wei [1] and one by Remi
[
I'm afraid I don't agree on some of your comments, Wido.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 02/05/2018 04:44 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
>> H devs,
>>
>> I have recently (re-)submitted two PRs, one by Wei [1] and one by Remi
>> [2],
>> that reduce downtime for red
On 02/05/2018 04:44 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
H devs,
I have recently (re-)submitted two PRs, one by Wei [1] and one by Remi [2],
that reduce downtime for redundant routers and redundant VPCs respectively.
(please review those)
Now from customers we hear that they also want to reduce downtime f
H devs,
I have recently (re-)submitted two PRs, one by Wei [1] and one by Remi [2],
that reduce downtime for redundant routers and redundant VPCs respectively.
(please review those)
Now from customers we hear that they also want to reduce downtime for
regular VRs so as we discussed this we came to
16 matches
Mail list logo
