Just as an FYI, we've dramatically increased Travis capacity.
https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/apache_gains_additional_travis_ci
On Thursday, April 30, 2015, Abhinandan Prateek <
abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> Yes, lot of sanity testing can be accomplished by the automated test
>
Yes, lot of sanity testing can be accomplished by the automated test suites
that we already have.
There are still lot of tests that can be run using the travis-CI, (need to see
how many more without loading the travis system). Some of the companies
including Shapeblue are already running most o
I agree that we should be relying on automated tests.
It's too hit or miss (not to mention slow) when we put so much weight on
semi random testing.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 8:12 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> The problem is really two fold.
> Cutting an RC isn't terribly time consuming, once you've d
+1 Totally agree and willing to help make it happen!
Sent from my iPhone
> On 30 Apr 2015, at 04:12, David Nalley wrote:
>
> The problem is really two fold.
> Cutting an RC isn't terribly time consuming, once you've done it a
> dozen times or so, it goes by pretty quickly.
>
> The problem is t
The problem is really two fold.
Cutting an RC isn't terribly time consuming, once you've done it a
dozen times or so, it goes by pretty quickly.
The problem is the time it takes to do any material testing; and that
we don't have a way of telling what the status of a candidate is
without doing lots
Hi Erik,
What you’re reporting is a strange behaviour indeed. I still suspect it is
likely an environment issue as I’ve been testing 4.5 for last few months now
and have not hit anything like this. Can you try to shutdown the mgmt server
(and agent if it’s KVM) and then pre-seed a 4.5 systemvm
Den onsdag 29. april 2015 skrev Rohit Yadav
følgende:
> Hi Erik,
>
> > On 29-Apr-2015, at 4:25 pm, Erik Weber > wrote:
> >
> > Then it should always happen, no?
> >
> > It is sporadic, currently i have four routers happily being 4.5, but one
> > that is 4.4.
>
> If you remove the VR which is 4.4
Hi Erik,
> On 29-Apr-2015, at 4:25 pm, Erik Weber wrote:
>
> Then it should always happen, no?
>
> It is sporadic, currently i have four routers happily being 4.5, but one
> that is 4.4.
If you remove the VR which is 4.4, please check if the new one that gets
created is 4.5 or still 4.4?
Was t
Then it should always happen, no?
It is sporadic, currently i have four routers happily being 4.5, but one
that is 4.4.
Erik
Den onsdag 29. april 2015 skrev Rohit Yadav
følgende:
> Hi Erik,
>
> > On 29-Apr-2015, at 3:04 pm, Erik Weber > wrote:
> >
> >
> > One bug I've found which drives me c
Hi Wilder - Thanks we’ll need all the ammo we have :) I’ve already done my
testings wrt XS 6.2/6.5 and KVM qemu 2.0/2.1/2.2 so will test KVM 1.5 and
VMware 5.5.
Hi Daan - makes sense, we’re “so" late with 4.5.1 that we need to focus on
4.6.0 to avoid delaying it. I’ve asked David regarding co-p
Hi Erik,
> On 29-Apr-2015, at 3:04 pm, Erik Weber wrote:
>
>
> One bug I've found which drives me crazy is that, for some reason, the VR
> is versioned as 4.4.0 and needs to be upgraded.
> This only happens once in a while, and I have a hard time reproducing it.
> What drives me crazy is that 4.4
Rohit,
@SBP we are busy basing our attempt at CD on 4.4. As Wilder said we will
spend some time on testing 4.5 but hopefully we will go to master/4.6 soon.
@David: will you make a new RC? (please please, pretty please. We made a
bugfix in the plane to Austin we want in)
Op wo 29 apr. 2015 om 15
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> ### 4.5 Release Effort
>
> I’ve been exhaustively testing ACS 4.5 wrt Xen 6.2, Xen 6.5, KVM (qemu
> 2.0, 2.3) and I feel we’re pretty good but we need testing efforts and I
> want to help drive efforts to releasing ACS 4.5.1 -- if
Hi Rohit,
I will join you in testing 4.5 form next week - just have to finish some stuff.
My environments will be:
* Xen 6.2/6.5
* KVM (qemu 1.5.3 and 2.1)
Let’s rock!
Cheers,
Wilder
On 28 Apr 2015, at 18:33, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> ### 4.5 Release Effort
>
> I’ve been exhaustive
Hi all,
### 4.5 Release Effort
I’ve been exhaustively testing ACS 4.5 wrt Xen 6.2, Xen 6.5, KVM (qemu 2.0,
2.3) and I feel we’re pretty good but we need testing efforts and I want to
help drive efforts to releasing ACS 4.5.1 -- if you’ve any issues that you
would like to get fixed that are eit
15 matches
Mail list logo
