Re: [DISCUSS] PR list length

2015-07-17 Thread Daan Hoogland
the rule. > > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, 17 July 2015 16:50 > To: dev > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] PR list length > > I agree as well and since I started this thread a lot of work is being done > to keep the

RE: [DISCUSS] PR list length

2015-07-17 Thread Koushik Das
d the request is pending for more than a >> specified time (may be 7 days). For new features the existing process >> should be fine. >> > >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] >> > Sent: Tuesday, 14 July 201

Re: [DISCUSS] PR list length

2015-07-17 Thread Daan Hoogland
specified time (may be 7 days). For new features the existing process >> should be fine. >> > >> > -----Original Message- >> > From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] >> > Sent: Tuesday, 14 July 2015 17:42 >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] PR list length

2015-07-17 Thread Rajani Karuturi
ls and the request is pending for more than a > specified time (may be 7 days). For new features the existing process > should be fine. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] > > Sent: Tuesday, 14 July 2015 17:42 > > T

Re: [DISCUSS] PR list length

2015-07-15 Thread Wilder Rodrigues
r [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] > Sent: Tuesday, 14 July 2015 17:42 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] PR list length > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 14-07-15 13:56, Daan Hoogland wrote: >> H, >> >> It is

RE: [DISCUSS] PR list length

2015-07-14 Thread Koushik Das
] Sent: Tuesday, 14 July 2015 17:42 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] PR list length -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 14-07-15 13:56, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > It is a concern to me that the list of PRs on our github page is > beyond a single

Re: [DISCUSS] PR list length

2015-07-14 Thread Wido den Hollander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 14-07-15 13:56, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > It is a concern to me that the list of PRs on our github page is > beyond a single page (maybe configurable but now a t a very > reasonable 25). I think we should adhere to a discipline of not > ha

Re: [DISCUSS] PR list length

2015-07-14 Thread Rohit Yadav
On 14-Jul-2015, at 5:26 pm, Daan Hoogland mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote: H, It is a concern to me that the list of PRs on our github page is beyond a single page (maybe configurable but now a t a very reasonable 25). I think we should adhere to a discipline of not having any PRs open a

[DISCUSS] PR list length

2015-07-14 Thread Daan Hoogland
H, It is a concern to me that the list of PRs on our github page is beyond a single page (maybe configurable but now a t a very reasonable 25). I think we should adhere to a discipline of not having any PRs open after the weekend. This is putting a very strong statement outthere, I realize. A PR m