. However, feel free to
discuss/work on the proposed features/integrations separately.
Regards.
From: Rene Moser
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 8:37:49 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move to Debian9 systemvmtemplate
Hi Rohit
First, thank
Hi Rohit
First, thank you very much for the effort!
On 11/21/2017 01:07 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Please advise if you can collaborate with me on this, especially around
> testing. Thanks!
I have some 2 "nice to have"s, AFAICS these haven't been addressed yet:
- SNMP readonly listen on "linklo
From: Paul Angus
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 11:11:53 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Move to Debian9 systemvmtemplate
Depending on the timescales that we looking at, if we can get an agreement to
use Packer going forward, there is an argument to say that spending time
getting
nday, July 31, 2017 11:11:53 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Move to Debian9 systemvmtemplate
Depending on the timescales that we looking at, if we can get an agreement to
use Packer going forward, there is an argument to say that spending time
getting the Debian 9 template
@shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 28 July 2017 20:30
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move to Debian9 systemvmtemplate
>
> I think we can move to packer once we can g
shapeblue
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 28 July 2017 20:30
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move to Debian9 systemvmtemplate
I think we can move to packer once we can get the Debian9 based
systemvmtemplate to work.
I
This is awesome Tim. Any chance we merge it upstream with Packer?
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Tim Mackey wrote:
> Syed,
>
> I did a bunch of work on XenServer with Packer [1] before leaving Citrix.
> My stuff works rather well and was tested with XS 6.2, 6.5 and 7. It
> shouldn't be hard
peblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 28 July 2017 20:30
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move to Debian9 systemvmtemplate
I think we c
.
Thanks.
- Rohit
From: Tim Mackey
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 3:59:36 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move to Debian9 systemvmtemplate
Syed,
I did a bunch of work on XenServer with Packer [1] before leaving Citrix.
My stuff works
Syed,
I did a bunch of work on XenServer with Packer [1] before leaving Citrix.
My stuff works rather well and was tested with XS 6.2, 6.5 and 7. It
shouldn't be hard to validate with newest XS and updated Packer - I just
lack the infra to do the testing.
[1] https://github.com/xenserverarmy/pack
-1 on Arch as well. Moving to Debian 9 seems the wiser choice IMO. I've
used Packer before and I really like it, the only downside that I see is
that Packer lacks support for XenServer VHD images. There is some work on a
XenServer plugin but I haven't tested that. If the community decides to use
Pa
> Op 24 juli 2017 om 19:07 schreef Rene Moser :
>
>
> Hi Rohit
>
>
> On 07/23/2017 06:08 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> > All,
> >
> >
> > Just want to kick an initial discussion around migration to Debian9 based
> > systemvmtemplate, and get your feedback on the same.
> >
> > Here's a work-in-p
Hi Rohit
On 07/23/2017 06:08 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> All,
>
>
> Just want to kick an initial discussion around migration to Debian9 based
> systemvmtemplate, and get your feedback on the same.
>
> Here's a work-in-progress PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2198
Have you consider
Hi
On 07/23/2017 06:21 PM, Paul Angus wrote:
>
> I think that we should look at lighter Distros like Arch Linux in order to
> get the boot times of the system VMs down.
> That in conjunction with improving the configuration will gives as a much
> leaner, meaner System VM.
I tend to -1 for Arch
di
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 6:34:08 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move to Debian9 systemvmtemplate
First one come to my mind is VPN feature.
But other general issues will depend on what are changed in debain9.
Thanks,
Jayapal
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shape
on WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 23 July 2017 17:08
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Move to Debian9 systemvmtemplate
>
> All,
>
>
>
First one come to my mind is VPN feature.
But other general issues will depend on what are changed in debain9.
Thanks,
Jayapal
> On Jul 24, 2017, at 9:54 AM, Satki Badal wrote:
>
> Hi Jayapal,
>
> Do we know what all features re covered by Marvin and what all will require
> manual testing
Hi Jayapal,
Do we know what all features re covered by Marvin and what all will require
manual testing ?
I guess without this list we can never be sure is all the features got tested
or not.
Thanks,
Satki
> On 24-Jul-2017, at 9:48 AM, Jayapal Uradi
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We should throughly
Hi,
We should throughly check all the VR features to see feature breakage because
of Debian9.
Thanks,
Jayapal
> On Jul 23, 2017, at 9:38 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> All,
>
>
> Just want to kick an initial discussion around migration to Debian9 based
> systemvmtemplate, and get your feedba
Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 23 July 2017 17:08
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Move to Debian9 systemvmtemplate
All,
Just want to kick an initial discussion
All,
Just want to kick an initial discussion around migration to Debian9 based
systemvmtemplate, and get your feedback on the same.
Here's a work-in-progress PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2198
Regards.
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Gard
21 matches
Mail list logo
